Skip to Content.

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Sizes of inline logos in eduGAIN metadata

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive


Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Sizes of inline logos in eduGAIN metadata


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ian Young <ian AT iay.org.uk>
  • To: Peter Schober <peter.schober AT univie.ac.at>
  • Cc: edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Sizes of inline logos in eduGAIN metadata
  • Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:00:12 +0000
  • Feedback-id: 217.155.173.110


> On 2020-03-10, at 17:37, Peter Schober <peter.schober AT univie.ac.at> wrote:
>
> Do we need an amendment of the MDUI spec before we start
> allowing/promoting/demanding SVG logos at scale?

I don't think there's anything in the MDUI spec that precludes the use of
SVG. It does talk about vector formats, as follows:

> Note that while vector graphic formats may be renderable at many sizes, the
> height and width attrib-
> utes remain mandatory to allow consumers that lack intelligence regarding
> image processing to locate im-
> ages suitable for particular sizes. The same image MAY be specified with
> multiple sizes when appropri-
> ate.

That still seems right, I think.

Seem as if use of SVG would be a question for national and/or eduGAIN
profiles.

-- Ian


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page