Skip to Content.

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] reference for expired certificate warning

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive


Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] reference for expired certificate warning


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Leif Johansson <leifj AT sunet.se>
  • To: Warda Al Habsi <warda AT omren.om>
  • Cc: Nick Roy <nroy AT internet2.edu>, "edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org" <edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org>
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] reference for expired certificate warning
  • Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:36:45 +0800



Skickat från min iPhone

> 21 nov. 2019 kl. 12:12 skrev Warda Al Habsi <warda AT omren.om>:
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> Yes they are using ADFS-Toolkit for the metadata aggregation and attribute
> release.
> With great efforts and support from Chris Philips from CANARIE, we are able
> to use it and contribute in the improvement of the Tool.
> I believe this is the power of the community.
>

Well said.

We definitely want to push MSFT to do better than to throw up our hands in
despair.

There is no harm in flexing the muscles we do have. Just because some of us
have been able to successfully integrate ADFS doesn’t mean we shouldn’t stand
in solidarity with those who face more pain.

Cheers Leif

> Best regards,
>
> Warda Al Habsi,
> Applications Manager
> Oman Research and Education Network - OMREN,
> The Research Council
> P.O.Box 92, Innovation Park Muscat - Al Khoud 123,
> Sultanate of Oman
> M: +968 90991133
> F: +968 22305820
> E: warda AT omren.om
> W: www.omren.om
> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1769-4670
>
> OMREN is an initiative by the research council Oman (TRC) to contribute to
> the rise of an effective national innovation ecosystem, and provide the
> research and education community in the sultanate of Oman with a common
> network and collaboration infrastructure dedicated and adapted to their
> needs.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Roy <nroy AT internet2.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 9:43 PM
> To: Warda Al Habsi <warda AT omren.om>
> Cc: Leif Johansson <leifj AT sunet.se>; edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org
> Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] reference for expired certificate warning
>
> Hi Warda,
>
> Are they using ADFStoolkit or something similar in order to load metadata
> on a regular basis?
>
> Best,
>
> Nick
>
>> On 20 Nov 2019, at 9:41, Warda Al Habsi wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to share the OMREN experience, 100% of our members are on
>> ADFS and support is normal compared to Shibboleth. I'm a team member who
>> worked on two different federations on both Shibboleth and ADFS.
>> I can see a big difference between the two options at least in Oman. Our
>> members are more interested and responsive with ADFS and they can do the
>> initial troubleshooting. Our users are not forced to use ADFS, they can
>> select other options as well. We were able to form a task force team from
>> the members, so they collaborate and help each other.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Warda Al Habsi,
>> Applications Manager
>> Oman Research and Education Network - OMREN, The Research Council
>> P.O.Box 92, Innovation Park Muscat - Al Khoud 123, Sultanate of Oman
>> M: +968 90991133
>> F: +968 22305820
>> E: warda AT omren.om
>> W: www.omren.om
>> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1769-4670
>>
>> OMREN is an initiative by the research council Oman (TRC) to contribute to
>> the rise of an effective national innovation ecosystem, and provide the
>> research and education community in the sultanate of Oman with a common
>> network and collaboration infrastructure dedicated and adapted to their
>> needs.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: edugain-discuss-request AT lists.geant.org
>> <edugain-discuss-request AT lists.geant.org> On Behalf Of Leif Johansson
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 2:34 PM
>> To: edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org
>> Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] reference for expired certificate
>> warning
>>
>>> On 2019-11-20 09:50, Peter Schober wrote:
>>> * Nick Roy <nroy AT internet2.edu> [2019-11-20 00:03]:
>>>> Perhaps counterproductively adding to my rant below: ADFS is
>>>> terrible, but works just well enough to lull people into the belief
>>>> that it won’t screw everything up, as it invariably does, down the
>>>> road. I spend at least 80% of my direct-end-user-contact time
>>>> coaching people with ADFS problems. ADFS *should not be used* in the
>>>> context of R&E federations, nor should other similar software. This
>>>> is a real problem that I don’t know how to address in our context,
>>>> but the problem is getting worse every day.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your very clear words in this regard.
>>>
>>> Maybe this should be made known more widely? Open to ideas how that
>>> would work. A REFEDS blog post? A disclaimer message to be relayed by
>>> (Full Mesh) federations?
>>> I'll start by quoting your post above in our documentation.
>>>
>>> At this time we only have a single MS-ADFS entity registered, so my
>>> communication has been pretty clear and seemingly was effective so
>>> far. That one entity could end up being used a lot more, though,
>>> through services proxied behind its SP-side...
>>>
>>> -peter
>>>
>>
>> While I tend to agree the pain is mostly localized to those that choose to
>> sniff this particular sock. The organizations who run ADFS do that for
>> reasons that will not be influenced by what REFEDS say.
>>
>> We may be able to get MSFT to improve things... I have had some chats with
>> their new head of identity (or whatever the title is) Pamela Dingle who at
>> least make the right noices. I know this is not the first time somebody
>> said this too.
>>
>> Possibly a statement from REFEDS if wielded in a smart way may serve to
>> make things a bit more concrete.
>>
>> Cheers Leif



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page