Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN and non "academic" IdPs

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive

Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN and non "academic" IdPs


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Kristof Bajnok <bajnokk AT niif.hu>
  • To: Tom Scavo <trscavo AT internet2.edu>, "edugain-discuss AT geant.net" <edugain-discuss AT geant.net>
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN and non "academic" IdPs
  • Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 17:00:02 +0100
  • List-archive: <https://mail.geant.net/mailman/private/edugain-discuss/>
  • List-id: eduGAIN discussion list <edugain-discuss.geant.net>
  • Organization: NIIF Institute

On 2014-11-28 16:47, Kristof Bajnok wrote:
> On 2014-11-28 16:01, Tom Scavo wrote:
>> A question for other responders: I'm not getting the connection to
>> Research & Scholarship. AFAIK there is nothing in the spec to restrict
>> an arbitrary IdP from self-declaring its support for R&S. Am I missing
>> something?
>
> Obviously no, that needs to be defined as another category.

Sorry, the ambiguous 'that' in my sentence refers to a new category that
would contain the "academic IdPs".

> But IMO it would be much more complex than R&S was. R&S category
> authorises an SP is to allow access to some basic attributes.

>From the R&S Support IdPs, and only in certain circumstances.

> The new
> category would authorise the IdP's users to get higher level access at
> some (unknown) service providers.

Given I have understood Jozef right about the needs of some of their SPs.

Kristof






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page