Skip to Content.

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Who is the registrar for R&S in eduGAIN?

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive


Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Who is the registrar for R&S in eduGAIN?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ian Young <ian AT iay.org.uk>
  • To: Tom Scavo <trscavo AT internet2.edu>
  • Cc: "edugain-discuss AT geant.net" <edugain-discuss AT geant.net>
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Who is the registrar for R&S in eduGAIN?
  • Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:07:30 +0100
  • List-archive: <http://mail.geant.net/pipermail/edugain-discuss/>
  • List-id: "An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service." <edugain-discuss.geant.net>


> On 3 Jul 2015, at 10:03, Tom Scavo <trscavo AT internet2.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Niels van Dijk <niels.vandijk AT surfnet.nl>
> wrote:
>>
>> Could we imagine eduGAIN itself being the registrar?
>
> If eduGAIN itself publishes metadata, and it does so according to its
> own policies and procedures, then eduGAIN itself will have to do at
> least the following:
>
> 1) assign itself a registrar ID
> 2) publish a Metadata Registration Practice Statement
> 3) publish a link to its export aggregate
>
> and so forth.

Agreed. It's not a trivial undertaking.

> In particular, how will eduGAIN itself be able to sign the eduGAIN
> participation agreement? How could that possibly have any meaning?

It's a declaration, not an agreement, so that's actually less of a problem.
Who would be making the declaration would be more of a problem, as eduGAIN
doesn't itself have legal personality as things stand.

-- Ian




Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page