Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Who is the registrar for R&S in eduGAIN?

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive

Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Who is the registrar for R&S in eduGAIN?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <trscavo AT internet2.edu>
  • To: Niels van Dijk <niels.vandijk AT surfnet.nl>
  • Cc: "edugain-discuss AT geant.net" <edugain-discuss AT geant.net>
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Who is the registrar for R&S in eduGAIN?
  • Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:03:36 -0400
  • Authentication-results: prod-mail.geant.net (amavisd-new); dkim=pass header.i= AT gmail.com
  • List-archive: <http://mail.geant.net/pipermail/edugain-discuss/>
  • List-id: "An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service." <edugain-discuss.geant.net>

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Niels van Dijk <niels.vandijk AT surfnet.nl>
wrote:
>
> Could we imagine eduGAIN itself being the registrar?

I can't imagine this, no.

If eduGAIN itself publishes metadata, and it does so according to its
own policies and procedures, then eduGAIN itself will have to do at
least the following:

1) assign itself a registrar ID
2) publish a Metadata Registration Practice Statement
3) publish a link to its export aggregate

and so forth. In other words, eduGAIN itself would become a
federation, which seems to me to be a potential conflict of interest.
In particular, how will eduGAIN itself be able to sign the eduGAIN
participation agreement? How could that possibly have any meaning?

Tom





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page