Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN and non "academic" IdPs

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive

Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN and non "academic" IdPs


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Martin Matthiesen <martin.matthiesen AT csc.fi>
  • To: edugain-discuss AT geant.net
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN and non "academic" IdPs
  • Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:11:08 +0200 (EET)
  • List-archive: <https://mail.geant.net/mailman/private/edugain-discuss/>
  • List-id: eduGAIN discussion list <edugain-discuss.geant.net>

Hello,
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tomasz Wolniewicz" <twoln AT umk.pl>
> To: edugain-discuss AT geant.net
> Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 15:02:20
> Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN and non "academic" IdPs

> Hi,
> I started wondering why we have this discussion, except because it is
> an interesting topic. We are trying to solve a use case which, as far as
> I can recall has not been defined.

The original problem was that eduGAIN has commercial IdPs in their ranks and
what to do about that. It evolved to a discussion about attribute semantics,
specifically EPA.

> I would really be interested in what
> motivates the given SP to limit its service to a loosely defined group
> of users. What would this SP loose by opening itself to the entire human
> population?

I this case it is about a newspaper text corpus from a major publisher in
Finland that is easier to make available to academics only than to the
general population. IPR is connected to access here. Free for all would
either not have been possible or expensive.

[...]

Martin





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page