RARE user and assistance email list

[mc36 <>]

uhhh, please remove the ip address from the bvi1 and bun1.11,
as if it have an ip then it'll be exported as routed port...
also please remove the export-port bvi1 dynamic beforehand...
also a clear p4 p4 may be needed after doing so...
after that, if the bridge tables stays the same, it should work...
br,
cs


On 10/24/22 15:47, Xavier Jeannin wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thank you for your help
>
> I just come back and put the IP address on the bviX interface instead of 
> Bund1.X
>
> Find below the show bridge1
> It seems the mac learning works
>
> No the from Bund1.11 and now bvi1 - ping does not work
> Would you like I put a IPv4 @ on sdn4.11?
>
>
>
> thank you
> Xavier
>
> Le 24/10/2022    15:16, mc36 a   crit  :
> > hi,
> > sad to hear that.. does the bundling alone work? i saw a .11 subinterface in 
> > your configs, does that one ping?
> > also, does the mac learning at least work? could you please share sho bri 1 
> > from both boxes?
> > thanks,
> > cs
> >
> >
> > On 10/24/22 14:37, Xavier Jeannin wrote:
> > > Hello Csaba,
> > >
> > > I apply your example but it does not work.
> > > I am pretty sure, it is a misconfiguration     :-(
> > >
> > > I put the configuration of the 2 switch attached and few show commands below
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > > Xavier
> > >
> > > DAV0101#show bundle 1
> > > parameter     state
> > > backup                 0
> > > selected         null
> > > replicate     false
> > > sequence         null
> > > dejitter         0
> > > reporter         0
> > > dynamic             0
> > >
> > > interface     state     quota     report     priority
> > > sdn4                         up                 2000         0                
> > >          0
> > > sdn5                         up                 2000         0                
> > >          0
> > >
> > > DAV0101#show bundle 1
> > > parameter     state
> > > backup                 0
> > > selected         null
> > > replicate     false
> > > sequence         null
> > > dejitter         0
> > > reporter         0
> > > dynamic             0
> > >
> > > interface     state     quota     report     priority
> > > sdn4                         up                 2000         0                
> > >          0
> > > sdn5                         up                 2000         0                
> > >          0
> > >
> > > DAV0101#show lacp neighbor
> > > interface     system port                 state
> > > sdn4                         32768.0000.0000.1234.12345     32768.3     63
> > > sdn5                         32768.0000.0000.1234.12345     32768.1     63
> > >
> > >
> > > DAV0001#show bundle 1
> > > parameter     state
> > > backup                 0
> > > selected         null
> > > replicate     false
> > > sequence         null
> > > dejitter         0
> > > reporter         0
> > > dynamic             0
> > >
> > > interface     state     quota     report     priority
> > > sdn7                         up                 2000         0                
> > >          0
> > > sdn10                     up                 2000         0                   
> > >       0
> > >
> > > DAV0001#show lacp neighbor
> > > interface     system port                 state
> > > sdn10                     32768.0000.0000.4321.12345     32768.4     63
> > > sdn7                         32768.0000.0000.4321.12345     32768.2     63
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 24/10/2022       13:07, mc36 a     crit   :
> > > > hi,
> > > > in general, bundles are created over physical interfaces and not 
> > > > subinterfaces...
> > > > so you have to bundle the sdns togeher, then configure the subinterface on 
> > > > top of the bundle interface...
> > > > much like this: http://sources.freertr.org/cfg/p4lang-rout018.tst
> > > > here you create a vlan 11 subinterface on top of sdn3 and sdn4...
> > > > br,
> > > > cs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/24/22 12:11, Xavier Jeannin wrote:
> > > > > Hello Csaba,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank         you for your email.
> > > > > I want to collect our user traffic and put their traffic in a dedicated VLAN 
> > > > > (then established the BGP peering between the RENATER bacbone PE and the 
> > > > > client) - see picture below.
> > > > >
> > > > > My understanding (I am certainly         wrong) is that I have to put the interface (sdnXX) in the bundle (not the sub interface) and it should be enough (see configuration 
> > > > > attached).
> > > > > But it does not work
> > > > > I try also to put the sub-interface but no success.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you advice what type of configuration should I use for this use case?
> > > > >
> > > > > The example available on http://docs.freertr.org/guides/reference/ are
> > > > >
> > > > > conn-bundle01                                                     bundle of 
> > > > > ethernet port
> > > > > conn-bundle02                                                     bundle of 
> > > > > serial port
> > > > > conn-bundle03                                                     bundle of 
> > > > > ethernet ports
> > > > > conn-bundle04                                                     bundle of 
> > > > > serial ports
> > > > > conn-bundle05                                                     bundle over 
> > > > > bridge
> > > > > conn-bundle06                                                     bridge over 
> > > > > bundle
> > > > > conn-bundle07                                                     replicating 
> > > > > bundle
> > > > > conn-bundle08                                                     
> > > > > unreplicating bundle
> > > > > conn-bundle09                                                     dejittering 
> > > > > bundle
> > > > > conn-bundle10                                                     
> > > > > loadbalancing bundle
> > > > > conn-bundle11                                                     
> > > > > multichassis bundle
> > > > > conn-bundle12                                                     backup 
> > > > > bundle
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Xavier
> > > > >
> > > > > Le 20/10/2022             10:03, mc36 a         crit     :
> > > > > > hi,
> > > > > > lacp is there:
> > > > > > you have to configure it per member interface with both the lacp knob and the 
> > > > > > bundle-group knob...
> > > > > > the first one is just the protocol sender and you can omit if you do "mode 
> > > > > > on" on the remote side...
> > > > > > so that latter is the interesting part in the fastpath, and it's heavily 
> > > > > > tested with the dataplanes...
> > > > > > br,
> > > > > > cs
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 10/20/22 09:58,  wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I allow myself to post again this request about LACP supporting trunk as if 
> > > > > > > this would not be implemented, it will impact strongly our use case 
> > > > > > > deployment.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > Xavier
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Le 17/10/2022                         18:23, Xavier Jeannin a                 
> > > > > > > crit         :
> > > > > > > > Hello
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am still stuck with the creation of LACP handling a trunk.
> > > > > > > > In the meantime, I review my configuration and see that "bridge-group 2" was 
> > > > > > > > not declared in P4 server after correction same pb.
> > > > > > > > This really something that block this work.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Any suggestion ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > Xavier
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Le 27/09/2022                         10:37, Xavier Jeannin a                 
> > > > > > > > crit         :
> > > > > > > > > Hello
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I create a testbed on which (see picture attached):
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >          * the client is connected on a WEDGE (L2-PPN) at Layer 2 using 
> > > > > > > > > Ethernet                 or VLAN
> > > > > > > > >          * The WEDGE (L2PPN) should be connected to our backbone thanks to a 
> > > > > > > > > bond of interfaces (LACP). The traffic on the LACP must be a VLAN trunk.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I see a strange behaviour and it is certainly due to how I configure it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If I put the 2                 vlans (11-12) on the all interfaces taking 
> > > > > > > > > part on the LACP, it does not work.
> > > > > > > > > If                 I put the 1 vlan only on each interface of the taking part on the LACP, it                 works. But in this case the traffic should not be well shared between the 
> > > > > > > > > LACP links.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I suspect I implement this use case not appropriately (see configuration 
> > > > > > > > > attached + picture). Any suggestion?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > > Xavier
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Xavier JEANNIN
> > > > > > > > > Network Dpt.
> > > > > > > > > GN4-3 Network technology evolution (WP6 T1) task leader
> > > > > > > > > T         l. : +33 1 5394 2042
> > > > > > > > > Mob. : +33 6 3017 0963
> > > > > > > > > www.renater.fr
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Xavier JEANNIN
> > > > > > > > Network Dpt.
> > > > > > > > GN4-3 Network technology evolution (WP6 T1) task leader
> > > > > > > > T         l. : +33 1 5394 2042
> > > > > > > > Mob. : +33 6 3017 0963
> > > > > > > > www.renater.fr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Xavier JEANNIN
> > > > > > > Network Dpt.
> > > > > > > GN4-3 Network technology evolution (WP6 T1) task leader
> > > > > > > T         l. : +33 1 5394 2042
> > > > > > > Mob. : +33 6 3017 0963
> > > > > > > www.renater.fr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _._,_._,_
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > Groups.io Links:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You receive all messages sent to this group.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > View/Reply Online (#768) <https://groups.io/g/freertr/message/768> | Reply To Group 
> > > > > > > <> | Reply To Sender 
> > > > > > > <> | Mute This Topic 
> > > > > > > <https://groups.io/mt/93945667/6006518> | New Topic <https://groups.io/g/freertr/post>
> > > > > > > Your Subscription <https://groups.io/g/freertr/editsub/6006518> | Contact Group Owner <> | Unsubscribe <https://groups.io/g/freertr/unsub> 
> > > > > > > []
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _._,_._,_
> > > > > > From - Fri Oct 21 08:43:28 2022
> > > > > > X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
> > > > > > X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
> > > > > > Return-Path: <>
> > > > > > Received: from zmtain01.partage.renater.fr (LHLO
> > > > > > zmtain01.partage.renater.fr) (194.254.240.20) by
> > > > > > zstore-b1-018.partage.renater.fr with LMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 06:02:16
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Xavier JEANNIN
> > > > > Network Dpt.
> > > > > GN4-3 Network technology evolution (WP6 T1) task leader
> > > > > T     l. : +33 1 5394 2042
> > > > > Mob. : +33 6 3017 0963
> > > > > www.renater.fr
> --
> Xavier JEANNIN
> Network Dpt.
> GN4-3 Network technology evolution (WP6 T1) task leader
> T  l. : +33 1 5394 2042
> Mob. : +33 6 3017 0963
> www.renater.fr