edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org
Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.
List archive
- From: Peter Schober <peter.schober AT univie.ac.at>
- To: edugain-discuss AT geant.net
- Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 11:48:36 +0200
- Authentication-results: prod-mail.geant.net (amavisd-new); dkim=pass header.i= AT univie.ac.at
- List-archive: <https://mail.geant.net/mailman/private/edugain-discuss/>
- List-id: eduGAIN discussion list <edugain-discuss.geant.net>
- Organization: ACOnet
* Lukas Hämmerle <lukas.haemmerle AT switch.ch> [2014-07-02 11:37]:
> On 02.07.14 11:23, Peter Schober wrote:
> > I'm a bit unhappy with some of the (obviously well-intended)
> > things happening in the eduGAIN wiki, at
> > https://wiki.edugain.org/isFederatedCheck/ which I discovered just
> > now.
>
> It's still work in progress and there is a reason why this tool has
> not been widely announced yet :-) So, feedback like this is welcome.
OK. I just stumbled across it looking for something else.
> To be fair, many pages on the Federations Wiki are out-dated. So, a
> lot of handwork was needed to get the URLs in some cases (for the
> other's including ACONets I used the ones that Brook's catalog uses).
I think I told brook to update the URLs and the name used there (the
federation has not been using the "AAI" moniker for 3 years now, I
think). Since many of us are in fact collecting non-eduGAIN metadata
aggregates (for different purposes) that's a somewhat common issue, at
least common among people writing such tools
(cg. https://wayf.aco.net/smev/ ) ;)
I don't have a suggestion clearly superior other than the RFEDS
Federation, and that has already been announced to be turned off at
point (which was revoked later).
> Good point. Easy to fix. Main idea was to provide this for debugging
> purposes.
>
> I removed it.
Thanks. If others are happy with this you can just remove eduID.at
from there but then you can't claim to have "all known academic
identity federations" in there. ;)
(Maybe "All known acedemic identity federations except for one small
village of Gauls...").
> The reason for that was exactly to find the issues you mentioned above
> ("you are not using our correct metadata"). Option would be to instead
> link to an official metadata page where all that information can be found.
We provide just that in the REFEDS Federation Survey.
Best regards,
-peter
- [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks, Peter Schober, 02-Jul-2014
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks, Lukas Hämmerle, 02-Jul-2014
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks, Peter Schober, 07/02/2014
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks, Glenn Wearen, 02-Jul-2014
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks, Peter Schober, 02-Jul-2014
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks, Lukas Hämmerle, 02-Jul-2014
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks, Glenn Wearen, 02-Jul-2014
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks, Lukas Hämmerle, 16-Jul-2014
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks, Glenn Wearen, 02-Jul-2014
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks, Peter Schober, 07/02/2014
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] edugain wiki federation checks, Lukas Hämmerle, 02-Jul-2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.