Skip to Content.

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Machine readable and 'trusted' interfederation metadata

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive


Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Machine readable and 'trusted' interfederation metadata


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Niels van Dijk <niels.vandijk AT surfnet.nl>
  • To: Tomasz Wolniewicz <twoln AT umk.pl>, edugain-discuss AT geant.net
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Machine readable and 'trusted' interfederation metadata
  • Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 14:29:01 +0200
  • List-archive: <https://mail.geant.net/mailman/private/edugain-discuss/>
  • List-id: eduGAIN discussion list <edugain-discuss.geant.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04-08-14 12:36, Tomasz Wolniewicz wrote:
> Hi Niels, Whenever it comes to displaing information about
> individuals, I'm always reluctant, especially in a format that is
> easily harvested. Also in some cases federation administrators
> explicitly asked that their mails not be included on the status
> page.
>

For now I would only ask for publishing via the JSON interface
whatever you also publish on the HTML page. That is simple another
representation of what you already publish anyway.


> I would say that for any automated notification system you should
> only use the official federation contact, which is provided in my
> output. If you need more then you would have to do this manually
> (i.e. use the status page) and with a proper consideration. If I
> have an official matter to a federation operator I *always* use the
> generic contact email, only if this does not get replied to, I
> could use an individual SG representative mail.
>

I understand your point. For my usecase that is however not usable as
I cannot bind people (and thus logins) to that. However I think I can
come up with a way of using the official email to bootstrap this.



> Membership status - this is always "member". I do not inform about
> non-members, I do not see any reason why I should. They are not
> providing matadata to eduGAIN, therefore cannot be a part to any
> eduGAIN related problem.
>

Clear, thanks

Regards,
Niels

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=Qt7X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page