cat-users AT lists.geant.org
Subject: The mailing list for users of the eduroam Configuration Assistant Tool (CAT)
List archive
- From: Philippe Hanset <phanset AT anyroam.net>
- To: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter AT restena.lu>, cat-users AT geant.net
- Subject: Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 08:44:05 -0400
- Authentication-results: prod-mail.geant.net (amavisd-new); dkim=pass header.i= AT anyroam.net
- List-archive: <http://mail.geant.net/pipermail/cat-users/>
- List-id: "The mailing list for users of the eduroam Configuration Assistant Tool \(CAT\)" <cat-users.geant.net>
Stefan,
Since the rule of eduroam is that IdPs are the first and primary source of
support of their users
it seems logical to let IdPs decide what to do with the proxy-WPAD and HS2.0
options (or any “strong” option for that matter)
since, in the end, they will be the ones being called about it.
If IdPs turn HS2.0 off and users can’t join an HS2.0 SP because of this
decision, in general,
those users will again call their IdPs for support.
I definitely vote for letting IdPs decide what to do with those options,
and allow those features to be per-IdP items.
Philippe
Philippe Hanset
www.eduroam.us
>
> It's a good question and I have no idea (ok, our own offices hotspot
> does, that much I can say :-) ).
>
> The problem with this config item (as well as the proxy=auto one) is
> that the admin in CAT does not and cannot know whether turning it on or
> off is going to be useful to his users.
>
> Either his users eventually roam to a HS20 hotspot or not.
>
> Either his users eventually roam to a proxy-WPAD hotspot or not.
>
> That's why I'm reluctant to make these things a per-IdP config item...
> we're asking the wrong guy (and there is no right guy to ask). That
> calls for a global yes/no IMHO.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Stefan Winter
>
>
> --
> Stefan WINTER
> Ingenieur de Recherche
> Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
> de la Recherche
> 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
> L-1359 Luxembourg
>
> Tel: +352 424409 1
> Fax: +352 422473
>
> PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the
> recipient's key is known to me
>
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66
> <0x8A39DC66.asc>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, (continued)
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Tom Ivar Myren, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Stefan Winter, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Shane Schlosser, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Stefan Winter, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Kieran Denton, 05/28/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Stefan Winter, 05/28/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, A . L . M . Buxey, 05/28/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Stefan Winter, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Alan Buxey, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Philippe Hanset, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Chris Phillips, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Tomasz Wolniewicz, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, A . L . M . Buxey, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Tomasz Wolniewicz, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Chris Phillips, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Alan Buxey, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Stefan Winter, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, Stefan Winter, 05/29/2015
- Re: [cat-users] New CAT 1.1 iPhone Issues, A . L . M . Buxey, 05/28/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.