Subject: RARE user and assistance email list
List archive
- From: mc36 <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: [RARE-users] Fwd: SD-WHAT?
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:26:52 +0200
documenting...
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: SD-WHAT?
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:21:19 +0200
From: mc36 <>
Reply-To:
To: Moises R. N. Ribeiro <>
CC: Fr d ric LOUI <>, rafaelsg <>, Everson
Borges <>, Magnos Martinello <>
hi,
On 4/1/22 14:04, Moises R. N. Ribeiro wrote:
Csaba,well, for confidentiality, one needs at least a trusted key plus an endpoint
That's brilliant. This maybe indeed be just a "small discovery + peer distribution
(text) protocol" for a man, but a giant leap for mankind. :-)
So, it seems to me that most of the enabling technologies for our (dynamically routed
driven by twamp) overlay topology was already there. Now, the CPEs can find their peers
(or gateways when hub-spoke) to connect. This is a step toward "zero-touch"
we aim at too, right?
credentials for this to work....
(btw it's the same for cisco's viptela too...)
The ping tests seem great!dlmp is quite new to me, but after a quick look, it's somewhat cisco's
As far as performance is concerned, any chance of using/exploiting (whenever
it makes sense) link aggregation (e.g. trunk aggregation, dlmp, trill etc)
and load balancing at higher layer (at least ecmp)? I ask that because we
look forward on using this overlay network for multipath transport (e.g.
mptcp, dctcp) too. In addition, we would like to hear you views on how to
coordinate/obviate the multipath (and multilayer) features for end
applications.
mlacp...
so yess, we do support mlacp even in active-active, or even better, we do
evpn active-active...
regarding trill, that's something that short lived from the past, it died
before we had it :)
and finally yess we do support ecmp, ucmp (wcmp) and friends...
Oh, we should bother you soon on the openWRT AP integration/authorization
demo you did. We want to reproduce them here. To be frank with you, we don't
believe in your live demonstrations. You can prove me wrong, but I tell the
guys here that they are previously recorded and played in 2X during the
meeting just to impress us. :-)
:)
here is a sample openwrt for that:
root@apl:~# cat /etc/config/network
[..]
config interface 'mc36'
option proto 'none'
option ipv6 '0'
option auto '1'
option delegate '0'
option device 'br-mc36'
config interface 'g1'
option proto 'gretap'
option peeraddr '10.1.11.1'
option network 'mc36'
option ipv6 '0'
option mtu '1400'
config device
option name 'br-mc36'
option type 'bridge'
list ports 'gre-g1'
the freerouter side to catch the tunnels from the aps:
http://sources.freertr.net/cfg/p4lang-rout083.tst
ps: in the latest openwrts, they added support for luci-gre so if you're
lazy, you can configure the aps from the ui...
br,
cs
Regards,
Moises
----- Mensagem original -----
De: "cs" <>
Para: "Moises Renato Nunes Ribeiro" <>
Cc: "Fr d ric LOUI" <>, "rafaelsg" <>, "Everson Borges"
<>, "Magnos Martinello" <>
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 1 de abril de 2022 1:55:11
Assunto: Re: SD-WHAT?
:) it's just a small discovery + peer distribution (text) protocol,
all the rest is fully rfc complaint: ssh, pki, l2tp, mpls, macsec,
a routing protocol of your choice and twamp...
so it works well with the dataplanes
but it outperforms clearnet, by feeding twamp to the igp, and
then it could use intermediate nodes instead of direct ones...
look at the rtts below...
br,
cs
noti#ping vpn.nop.hu
info userReader.cmdEnter:userReader.java:1032 command noti#ping vpn.nop.hu from
local:telnet <loop> 23 -> 127.0.0.1 36366
2022-04-01 06:49:32
resolving vpn.nop.hu for ipv6 ok!
pinging 2a03:a140:10:2961::dead:babe, src=2001:db8:1101::11, vrf=inet, cnt=5,
len=64, tim=1000, gap=0, ttl=255, tos=0, sgt=0, flow=0, fill=0, sweep=false,
multi=false, detail=false
!!!!!
result=100%, recv/sent/lost/err=5/5/0/0, rtt min/avg/max/sum=36/38/45/198,
ttl min/avg/max=238/238/238, tos min/avg/max=0/0/0
noti#ping vpn.net.nop.hu
info userReader.cmdEnter:userReader.java:1032 command noti#ping vpn.net.nop.hu from
local:telnet <loop> 23 -> 127.0.0.1 36366
2022-04-01 06:49:35
resolving vpn.net.nop.hu for ipv6 ok!
pinging 2001:db8:1101::180, src=2001:db8:1101::11, vrf=inet, cnt=5, len=64,
tim=1000, gap=0, ttl=255, tos=0, sgt=0, flow=0, fill=0, sweep=false,
multi=false, detail=false
!!!!!
result=100%, recv/sent/lost/err=5/5/0/0, rtt min/avg/max/sum=21/21/22/107,
ttl min/avg/max=254/254/254, tos min/avg/max=0/0/0
noti#
On 3/31/22 23:06, Moises R. N. Ribeiro wrote:
Csaba,
A bird told me today about something you've been hiding from us:
http://sdwan.freertr.net/ <http://sdwan.freertr.net/>
It seems like you're grasping ideas out of thin air and transforming them
into concrete free code lines for the masses...
Very kind of you, but expect a visit of our corporate lawyers soon. :-)
Thanks a lot!
Moises
- [RARE-users] Fwd: SD-WHAT?, mc36, 04/01/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.