Rare project developers

[mc36 <cs@mp.ls>]

okkk, thanks, i think i can live with that :))


On 3/19/23 05:09, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai wrote:
> :-D. It   s just the future roadmap. There   s nothing to hide. :)
>
> Also, I don   t expect customers to jump from LU to CT immediately. ;-)
>
> So, CT stays a complementing companion to LU for the time being, instead of replacing it.     
>
> Thanks
>
> Kaliraj
>
> *From: *mc36 <cs@mp.ls>
> *Date: *Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 8:50 PM
> *To: *Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <kaliraj@juniper.net>, rare-dev@lists.geant.org <rare-dev@lists.geant.org>, Natrajan Venkataraman <natv@juniper.net>, Anton Elita <aelita@juniper.net>, 
> Fr  d  ric LOUI <frederic.loui@renater.fr>
> *Cc: *Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>, Reshma Das <dreshma@juniper.net>, Krzysztof 
> Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@juniper.net>, Alexander Gall <alexander.gall@switch.ch>
> *Subject: *Re: [rare-dev] RARE/freeRtr status @EANTC
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
>
> ommmmmmmm a way soo sorry, now the list heard a way more than expected, 
> thanks for the transparency! :)
>
> thanks,
>
> cs
>
>
> On 3/19/23 04:46, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai wrote:
> > That     s exactly right thinking Csaba.
>> Just that, today Junos BGP-CT implementation doesn     t support carrying 
best-effort tunnels, installing them in inet fib, etc. (So that PE1<->PE2 control 
plane packets can take the
> > CT LSP).
> >
> > IOW, BGP-CT learnt routes can be used as nexthop to resolve other BGP routes, 
> > but cannot themselves be installed in FIB.
> >
> > This is a TODO item in Junos. Once that is implemented, then LU can be 
> > avoided. You are right.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Kaliraj
> >
> > *From: *mc36 <cs@mp.ls>
> > *Date: *Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 8:35 PM
> > *To: *rare-dev@lists.geant.org <rare-dev@lists.geant.org>, Natrajan Venkataraman 
> > <natv@juniper.net>, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <kaliraj@juniper.net>, Anton Elita 
> > <aelita@juniper.net>,
> > Fr   d   ric LOUI <frederic.loui@renater.fr>
> > *Cc: *Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>, Reshma Das <dreshma@juniper.net>, Krzysztof 
> > Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@juniper.net>, Alexander Gall <alexander.gall@switch.ch>
> > *Subject: *Re: [rare-dev] RARE/freeRtr status @EANTC
> >
> > only one question, is rhere a specific reason that the best effort is not 
> > just an other color in the bgp-ct?
> >
> > btw im fine with the bgp-lu for that, but then freerouter would not need an 
> > additinal process then?
> >
> >
> > Juniper Business Use Only
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only