Rare project developers

[mc36 <>]

hmmm you're a way too good guys, you also should have a bit of rest then, 
we're almost there!

thaenks all the team then!

all the best!

cs

On 3/18/23 22:28, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai wrote:
> And ofcourse, Simon and Alex   s contribution in getting the stordis hardware 
> up and stable, with P4 forwarding installation working.
>
> Now, we still have a few last miles to go. And we have all hands on deck, 
> including Frederic and you.
>
> Hope we make it.     . We   ll reconvene on Monday. Signing off for the 
> weekend. :)
>
> You too get some sleep Csaba. All is well!.
>
> Thanks
>
> Kaliraj
>
> *From: *Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>
> *Date: *Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 2:23 PM
> *To: * <>, Anton Elita 
> <>, Fr  d  ric LOUI <>
> *Cc: *Simon Leinen <>, Natrajan Venkataraman <>, Reshma Das <>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <>, Alexander 
> Gall <>,  <>
> *Subject: *Re: [rare-dev] RARE/freeRtr status @EANTC
>
> Yes Csaba. We are using only 2 labels. Because it is IPv4-Unicast over 
> BGP-LU/CT over RSVP-TE.
>
> And yes, FreeRTR-Juniper are interoperating at various layers (IGP, RSVP-TE, BGP, LU, CT) perhaps for the first time.     
>
> Nats and Reshma made that happen, from FreeRTR config perspective.     
>
> Thanks
>
> Kaliraj
>
> *From: *mc36 <>
> *Date: *Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 2:18 PM
> *To: *Anton Elita <>, Fr  d  ric LOUI <>, 
> Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>
> *Cc: *Simon Leinen <>, Natrajan Venkataraman <>, Reshma Das <>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <>, Alexander 
> Gall <>,  <>
> *Subject: *Re: [rare-dev] RARE/freeRtr status @EANTC
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
>
> hmmm but be very careful, the dataplane have only 2 mpls labels!!!
>
> so my original plan was to do ibgp-ct between the two routers, and do the 
> ebgp-vpnv4 above that...
>
> that one should fit and should be colorful?
>
> if my side needs to put more labels then we'll fail!
>
> thanks,
>
> cs
>
> On 3/18/23 22:16, mc36 wrote:
> > whoooaaaa so there was the topology image but how? you managed to have a 
> > junos be in the same igp domain as freerouteer???
> >
> > my plan was a hairpin interface (lt in junos) and 2 vrfs to do the freertr 
> > asn......
> >
> > niceeee!
> >
> > good to hear that finally you have something and it's even better than i ever 
> > expected?! :)
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > cs
> >
> > On 3/18/23 22:14, mc36 wrote:
> > > On 3/16/23 18:34, Anton Elita wrote:
> > > > VMDK image seems not to be OK
> > >
> > > hmmm... the rtr.vmdk is just a debian-cloud-kernel, the latest openjdk and 
> > > the jar...
> > >
> > > that would surprise me if that is not ok, that's all the way software 
> > > forwarding?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > cs
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only