Rare project developers

[mc36 <>]

whereas in freerouter these are still the same table, regardless which afi 
the prefixes communicated through,

so that was why i asked originally my question.... :)

so as you know we mimic the cisco behavior and they just recently did started 
separating the afis,

but i think they not yet finished it fully, and it'll be a hard work, well, 
bgp-lu is out, and

it'll be hard to change all the existing configurations.... :)

clearly speaking, our geant's bgp-lu in prod looks like this at the moment on 
our asr9912:

 address-family ipv4 unicast
  allocate-label route-policy internal-loopback
 neighbor 62.40.102.26
  address-family ipv4 labeled-unicast



On 3/19/23 05:10, mc36 wrote:
> okkk, thanks, i think i can live with that :))
>
>
> On 3/19/23 05:09, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai wrote:
> > :-D. It   s just the future roadmap. There   s nothing to hide. :)
> >
> > Also, I don   t expect customers to jump from LU to CT immediately. ;-)
> >
> > So, CT stays a complementing companion to LU for the time being, instead of replacing it.     
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Kaliraj
> >
> > *From: *mc36 <>
> > *Date: *Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 8:50 PM
> > *To: *Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>,  <>, Natrajan Venkataraman <>, Anton Elita 
> > <>, Fr  d  ric LOUI <>
> > *Cc: *Simon Leinen <>, Reshma Das <>, Krzysztof 
> > Szarkowicz <>, Alexander Gall <>
> > *Subject: *Re: [rare-dev] RARE/freeRtr status @EANTC
> >
> > [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> >
> >
> > ommmmmmmm a way soo sorry, now the list heard a way more than expected, 
> > thanks for the transparency! :)
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > cs
> >
> >
> > On 3/19/23 04:46, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai wrote:
> > > That     s exactly right thinking Csaba.
> > >
> > > Just that, today Junos BGP-CT implementation doesn     t support carrying 
> > > best-effort tunnels, installing them in inet fib, etc. (So that PE1<->PE2 
> > > control plane packets can take the
> > > CT LSP).
> > >
> > > IOW, BGP-CT learnt routes can be used as nexthop to resolve other BGP routes, 
> > > but cannot themselves be installed in FIB.
> > >
> > > This is a TODO item in Junos. Once that is implemented, then LU can be 
> > > avoided. You are right.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Kaliraj
> > >
> > > *From: *mc36 <>
> > > *Date: *Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 8:35 PM
> > > *To: * <>, Natrajan Venkataraman 
> > > <>, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>, Anton Elita 
> > > <>,
> > > Fr   d   ric LOUI <>
> > > *Cc: *Simon Leinen <>, Reshma Das <>, Krzysztof 
> > > Szarkowicz <>, Alexander Gall <>
> > > *Subject: *Re: [rare-dev] RARE/freeRtr status @EANTC
> > >
> > > only one question, is rhere a specific reason that the best effort is not 
> > > just an other color in the bgp-ct?
> > >
> > > btw im fine with the bgp-lu for that, but then freerouter would not need an 
> > > additinal process then?
> > >
> > >
> > > Juniper Business Use Only
> >
> >
> > Juniper Business Use Only