Rare project developers

[Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>]

Yes Csaba. We are using only 2 labels. Because it is IPv4-Unicast over BGP-LU/CT over RSVP-TE.

 

And yes, FreeRTR-Juniper are interoperating at various layers (IGP, RSVP-TE, BGP, LU, CT) perhaps for the first time. 😊

 

Nats and Reshma made that happen, from FreeRTR config perspective. 😊

 

Thanks

Kaliraj

 

From: mc36 <>
Date: Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 2:18 PM
To: Anton Elita <>, Frédéric LOUI <>, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>
Cc: Simon Leinen <>, Natrajan Venkataraman <>, Reshma Das <>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <>, Alexander Gall <>, <>
Subject: Re: [rare-dev] RARE/freeRtr status @EANTC

[External Email. Be cautious of content]


hmmm but be very careful, the dataplane have only 2 mpls labels!!!

so my original plan was to do ibgp-ct between the two routers, and do the ebgp-vpnv4 above that...

that one should fit and should be colorful?

if my side needs to put more labels then we'll fail!

thanks,

cs

On 3/18/23 22:16, mc36 wrote:
> whoooaaaa so there was the topology image but how? you managed to have a junos be in the same igp domain as freerouteer???
>
> my plan was a hairpin interface (lt in junos) and 2 vrfs to do the freertr asn......
>
> niceeee!
>
> good to hear that finally you have something and it's even better than i ever expected?! :)
>
> thanks,
>
> cs
>
> On 3/18/23 22:14, mc36 wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/16/23 18:34, Anton Elita wrote:
>>> VMDK image seems not to be OK
>>
>> hmmm... the rtr.vmdk is just a debian-cloud-kernel, the latest openjdk and the jar...
>>
>> that would surprise me if that is not ok, that's all the way software forwarding?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> cs

Juniper Business Use Only