Rare project developers

[mc36 <>]

hi,

tbh i feel a bit lost now as i'm already sending in the first format 
suggestion of yours,
and i remember that it was not a week ago when we removed the nc: tag because 
some other
xml parser complained about it... surely i can revert it but now seeking for 
your confirmation...

thanks,
cs


2023-02-14 08:19:34.007 debug userNetconf.doSend:userNetconf.java:439 tx: <?xml 
version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
2023-02-14 08:19:34.024 debug userNetconf.doSend:userNetconf.java:439 tx: <rpc-reply 
message-id="1" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
2023-02-14 08:19:34.025 debug userNetconf.doSend:userNetconf.java:439 tx: 
<data><config><hostname><sid>
2023-02-14 08:19:34.025 debug userNetconf.doSend:userNetconf.java:439 tx: 
</sid></hostname>


On 2/13/23 16:52, David Schmitz wrote:
> So, could you make the reponse look like this:
>
> <rpc-reply xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"   
> message-id="urn:uuid:407d289f-567d-4130-a76c-82dca0612e09">
>
> or maybe
>
> <rpc-reply xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0" 
> xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0" 
> message-id="urn:uuid:407d289f-567d-4130-a76c-82dca0612e09">