Rare project developers

[mc36 <>]

so, when you cross poznan-geant boundary, from that point, you can only list 
loose path options...
and this is the point where you lose the path diversity....
and this what could be solved with -car or -ct


On 8/29/22 15:01, mc36 wrote:
> so the issue with inter-as rsvp-te is that you dont have the other domain's 
> topology in igp so you cannot calculate explicit-path at the headend pe
>
> On 8/29/22 14:59, mc36 wrote:
> > well, and so if the colorful labeled unicast crosses the asbr without rsvp 
> > but in pure bgp then it separates the domain not forcing anybody to pick 
> > rsvp...
> > especially inter-as rsvp-te is ugly as hell...
> > there are bad or even worse solutions:
> > -verbarim te, that is, loosely routed path options (sorry for cisco 
> > terminology)
> > -a controller...
> > -maybe others
> >
> > On 8/29/22 14:57, mc36 wrote:
> > > without running rsvp --- so a domain (like poznan) is free to use rsvp 
> > > internally but it won't force geant nor jisc to do so...
> > > so for example kifu <3 sr-mpls as far as i know....
> > >
> > > On 8/29/22 14:54, mc36 wrote:
> > > > well yess, we can have poznan---geant---jisc colorful bgp labeled unicast for 
> > > > example...
> > > > that is, poznan creates an mdvpn and can "request" 2 separate paths without 
> > > > running rsvp on the asbr! (the pe box peering with geant in bgp-lu)
> > > > juniper obviously does it for the mobile but here we can have reliable bier 
> > > > aka netmusic
> > > > but well, for that, a lot need to be designed, we really just have a high 
> > > > level design..
> > > > first one needs to thing that throughly, scratch an lld (max 10 lines)
> > > > then the coding, well, seems pretty easy....
> > > >
> > > > i bet i'll skip the lld part (as usual:)) after i read the hld 100 more 
> > > > times... :)
> > > >
> > > > On 8/29/22 14:47,  wrote:
> > > > > No problem at all !
> > > > >
> > > > > Let   s move on the next exciting topics !
> > > > > I   d like to see more development on BGP-CT, if I   m not wrong this will 
> > > > > unlock new inter domain services ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, thanks for all the work done so far
> > > > > Frederic
> > > > >
> > > > > > Le 29 ao  t 2022    14:42, mc36 <> a   crit :
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/29/22 14:38, Fr   d   ric LOUI wrote:
> > > > > > > - Simply because at the time PAR0101 was deployed CLEARNET did not exist.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > then i cannot say a thing than sorry
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > > > Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> > > > > View/Reply Online (#663): https://groups.io/g/freertr/message/663
> > > > > Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93323677/6006518
> > > > > Group Owner: 
> > > > > Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/freertr/unsub []
> > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-