cat-users AT lists.geant.org
Subject: The mailing list for users of the eduroam Configuration Assistant Tool (CAT)
List archive
- From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter AT restena.lu>
- To: Philippe Hanset <phanset AT anyroam.net>, cat-users AT geant.net
- Subject: Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request...
- Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:15:08 +0100
- List-archive: <https://mail.geant.net/mailman/private/cat-users/>
- List-id: "The mailing list for users of the eduroam Configuration Assistant Tool \(CAT\)" <cat-users.geant.net>
Hello,
One of the schools that uses CAT in our US federation asked me if
it would be possible
for CAT to automatically fill the REALM (or at least check
for its absence and warn the user) when users enter their
credentials.
It doesn't have to automatically add the REALM but it could
at least check for the existence of a structure of the form
*@*
We were thinking about this during the design phase of the tool. The issue with this is the inner identity does NOT have to contain any realm portion at all. The realm is only required in the outer identity to route the request to the IdP. There are no required naming conventions for the inner identity. I guess that probably many IdPs conflate these two independent names and do use the same realm in inner. But for those who don't (e.g. using a Windows DOMAIN\\user or "joe%accounting" or just "johndoe" without any qualifier), it would be a rather undue interference from the tool's side to throw a "Hey, are you sure you didn't forget an @ there?" in the user's face when the situation simply doesn't warrant it. We could try to make this configurable somewhat, but since there's no required convention on the format, this could be a bit messy... at best, I could imagine a config item "Prefill username with" and then those with a DOMAIN could do "MYDOMAIN\\" and others with a strange suffix construct would do "%accounting". It would still be up to the user to have the intelligence to put his username after vs. before what's prefilled - placing the cursor at a specific point in the UI is really rather hard, I would think. BTW... will you add the LOGOUT button on the admin interface?
As Tomasz noted, already implemented for the upcoming 1.1. :-) Greetings, Stefan Winter Thanks,
A bientôt,
Philippe
|
- [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Philippe Hanset, 11/01/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Brian Epstein, 11/01/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Tomasz Wolniewicz, 11/01/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Robert Mertling-Blake, 11/01/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Tomasz Wolniewicz, 11/02/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Robert Mertling-Blake, 11/01/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Tomasz Wolniewicz, 11/01/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Tomasz Wolniewicz, 11/01/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Stefan Winter, 11/02/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Tomasz Wolniewicz, 11/02/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Andrea Delise, 11/04/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Tomasz Wolniewicz, 11/04/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Andrea Delise, 11/04/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Tomasz Wolniewicz, 11/02/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Mike Dixson, 11/04/2013
- Re: [cat-users] this is not a problem but a request..., Brian Epstein, 11/01/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.