Rare project developers

[mc36 <>]

hi,

On 2/28/23 22:39, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai wrote:
> That   s cool. So now we have two demo setups:
>
> 1/ Csaba   s setup with FreeRTR as Ingress-PE doing colorful resolution.
>
> 2/ Natz setup with FreeRTR as ASBR doing colorful resolution.
>
> We could have a combo of the two setups, to show FreeRTR in both ASBR and 
> ingress-PE roles.   ;)

well, for a really really proper color resolution imho i need to introduce the 
"afi-vrf cust-blue resolve-in core-blue" knob...
it'll simply set the route's underlaying table like when we need to send out 
a vrf packet in mpls in the core vrf, but here,
it'll a per vrf override that i'll set that paramter to a user defined 
table... no fallback yet, just a static mechanism...
that'll be the first tomorrow what i'll start playing with... :)


> Just some comments -
>
> It   s worth noting that:
>
>     route-policy ibgp-in
>
>       sequence 10 if extcomm 2562:0:100
>
>       sequence 20     set vrf v2 ipv4
>
>       sequence 30     pass
>
>       sequence 40 enif
>
>       sequence 50 if extcomm 2562:0:200
>
>       sequence 60     set vrf v3 ipv4
>
>       sequence 70     pass
>
>       sequence 80 enif
>
>       sequence 90 drop
>
>       exit
>
> This policy config kind of implements the    resolution-scheme   . :)

yeahh, i knew that matching against the rd is not the color but the path... :)



> It works with LDP tunnels in VRFs v2, v3. BGP-CT routes are able to resolve 
> over LDP routes
>
> (in main VRF v1 or color VRFs v2,v3), and create SWAP routes properly.
>
> We could not make BGP routes resolve over RSVP-TE Tunnel routes in any VRF. 
> That   s why we used
>
> LDP-tunnels in previous IETF demo as-well. We may be missing something there.

so that was just another dirty hack that i put the rsvp to a dummy vrf to 
have a color on it.... :)


> And, the code-change in rtrBgpNeigh.java was needed to make the following 
> config work:

[..]

let's discuss this on my previous mail, i did a lot of changes to that part 
as i realized
that you were right and a lot were missing on that part of the code.... :)
thanks again for spotting it... :)

thanks,
cs