Subject: Rare project developers
List archive
- From: mc36 <>
- To: Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>, Natrajan Venkataraman <>
- Cc: Reshma Das <>, "" <>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <>
- Subject: Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 20:37:39 +0100
+ krzysztof && rare-dev as it's a core rare-dev question, thanks you!!!
hi,
you're crazy good, seemingly you know my shit better than me.... :)))))))
so that nexthop recursive was added when i given support for the original bgp
behavior of nexthop processing:
that is, when you no-next-hop-self toward the route reflectors on your
peering node...
freerouter by default assumes next-hop-self without that knob configured...
but you're right, basically that recursive knob could be reused for the
bgp-ct then i wont need two ebgp at eantc tests....
i'll try that asap !
ps: i <3 your private build XDDD
thanks,
cs
On 2/27/23 19:56, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai wrote:
Also, Csaba
Just some random observations:
This config looks interesting:
r4(cfg-rtr)#neighbor 2.2.2.3 address-family vpnuni
r4(cfg-rtr)#ne?
neighbor - specify neighbor parameters
* nexthop - specify next hop tracking parameter*
r4(cfg-rtr)#nexthop ?
prefix-list - filter next hops
*recursion - specify recursion depth*
route-map - filter next hops
route-policy - filter next hops
r4(cfg-rtr)#nexthop recursion ?
<num> - maximum rounds
r4(cfg-rtr)#nexthop recursion 4
and, from the code, this function arguments:
/**
* fix nexthops on a route entry
*
* @param <T> class of address
* @param imp route entry to update
* * @param recurs where to look up nexthops recursively*
* * @param nexthops table where look up resolved nexthops*
* @param recurn maximum recursion depth
* @return true if failed, false if ready
*/
public static <T extends addrType> boolean doNexthopFix(tabRouteEntry<T> imp,
tabRoute<T> recurs, tabRoute<T> nexthops, int recurn) {
(in tabRoute.java)
if we pass in the color vrf table v2 as recurs argument, will that
result in doing bgp nexthop resolution based on entries in that v2 table only?
Basically,
* from CLI, configure a community -> color-vrf/table mapping.
* When route is received, based on community, pick the color-table, and
pass it as recurs in the above function.
* That should result in resolving bgp nexthop over rsvp/ldp routes in that
color-table?
Then we wouldn t need the import policy to match on RD and set vrf nexthop.
And this method may work for all bgp families.
I have a dev setup with freeRtr code ready, where I wanted to experiment
doing the above. Just wanted to update you.
You can tell if I am understanding the code right, or if I am going in wrong
direction. Also, if you agree with the concept,
You will be able to code it faster.
bash-3.2$ dk rtr0
root@edc770cfeb8a:/opt/freertr# telnet localhost 2323
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
welcome
line ready
freertr#show ver
freeRouter v23.2.25-cur, done by cs@nop.
*private build - kaliraj -*****
place on the web: http://www.freertr.org/
license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
quote1: make the world better
I just got started, able to modify the version string and see the result.
Thanks
Kaliraj
*From: *Natrajan Venkataraman <>
*Date: *Saturday, February 25, 2023 at 11:52 AM
*To: *mc36 <>
*Cc: *Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>, Reshma Das
<>
*Subject: *BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution
Hi Csaba,
We tried experimenting the new free-rtr code for colorful resolution with the configuration that you had shared. However we are hitting a few roadblocks that needs to be addressed in free-rtr code.
The topology is as same as the demo that was performed in IETF 115 where resolution was happening via LDP best effort for BGP CT route in ASBR21 received from ASBR22 (10.22.22.22). However, we modified the demo based on the configs shared by you for colorful resolution.
We have attached the Old and New configs for your reference for ASBR21. Rest
of the configs (P2, ASR22) are more or less the same. You can refer to the
topology from the demo video.
Thanks,
-Nats-
DETAILS:
````````````
THIS IS THE NON-WORKING CASE WITH RSVP:
=======================================
The following is the summary list of what we are trying to achieve
@ ASBR 21,
- Configure VRF V2 and V3 to import based on BGP-CT RD/RT
freertr-asbr21#show running-config vrf v2
vrf
definition v2
rd
68106:168427528
rt4import
68106:168427528
rt6import
68106:168427528
exit
freertr-asbr21#show running-config vrf v3
vrf
definition v3
rd
68106:168427529
rt4import
68106:168427529
rt6import
68106:168427529
exit
- We created RSVP tunnels tunnel1 and tunnel2 in VRF v2 and v3 respectively
(However we keep tunnel VRF same as forwarding VRF)
freertr-asbr21#show running-config interface tunnel1
interface
tunnel1
description
lsp_asbr21_asbr22
tunnel vrf v2
tunnel source
loopback2
tunnel
destination 10.22.22.22
tunnel mode
p2pte
vrf
forwarding v2
ipv4 address
10.121.121.121 255.255.255.0
mpls enable
no shutdown
no
log-link-change
exit
freertr-asbr21#show running-config interface tunnel2
interface
tunnel2
description
lsp_asbr21_asbr22
tunnel vrf v3
tunnel source
loopback3
tunnel
destination 10.22.22.22
tunnel mode
p2pte
vrf
forwarding v3
ipv4 address
10.221.221.221 255.255.255.0
mpls enable
no shutdown
no
log-link-change
exit
!
freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 rsvp v2 summary
source
id subgroup id target id
description
10.121.21.21
8906 :: 0 10.22.22.22 902663016
freertr-asbr21:tunnel1
freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 rsvp v3 summary
source
id subgroup id target id
description
10.221.21.21
12715 :: 0 10.22.22.22 793731422
freertr-asbr21:tunnel2
- Then we added static routes for 10.22.22.22 in V2 and V3 to point to
tunnel1 and tunnel2.
(This we assume, prevents the need for rewriting the nexthop in policy
ibpg-in)
freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 route v2
typ prefix metric
iface hop time
S 10.22.22.22/32 1/0
tunnel1 10.121.121.122 02:19:56
freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 route v3
typ prefix metric
iface hop time
S 10.22.22.22/32 1/0
tunnel2 10.221.221.222 02:20:18
- Then we added policy ibgp-in to filter BGP CT routes to resolve on VRFs V2
and V3 based on RD
(However we found that the following policy is not applying on the BGP CT
routes, therefore BGP CT routes do not have a way to set their respective
resolving VRFs V2 and V3)
freertr-asbr21(cfg)#show running-config route-policy ibgp-in
route-policy ibgp-in
sequence 10 if rd 68106:168427528
sequence 20 set vrf v2 ipv4
sequence 30 pass
sequence 40 enif
sequence 50 if rd 68106:168427529
sequence 60 set vrf v3 ipv4
sequence 70 pass
sequence 80 enif
sequence 90 drop
exit
!
router bgp4 1
neighbor
10.20.20.20 route-policy-in ibgp-in
neighbor 10.20.20.20
vpn-route-policy-in ibgp-in <<<
What we are looking for is an installation of SWAP + PUSH for BGP-CT (SWAP) over RSVP (PUSH) similar to the working scenario (Option B) instead of what is being tried above which we assume is (Option A + B). The following section depicts the working case and expected behavior.
THIS IS THE WORKING CASE WITH LDP:
==================================
freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 bgp 1 ctp database
prefix hop
metric aspath
10.2.2.2/32 68098:33685512 10.11.121.1 20/100/0/0 64511
10.2.2.2/32 68098:33685513 10.11.121.1 20/100/0/0 64511
10.10.10.10/32 68106:168427528 10.22.22.22 200/100/0/0 64513
10.10.10.10/32 68106:168427529 10.22.22.22 200/100/0/0 64513 <<<<<
freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 bgp 1 ctp database 10.10.10.10/32 68106:168427529
id category value
vrf v1:4
ipver 4
rd 68106:168427529
alt0 nexthop 10.22.22.22
alt0 extended community 2562:0:200
alt0 remote label 833274 <<<<<
Here, the local labels are seen as part of the LDP database.
freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 ldp v1 database
prefix local remote hop
10.10.10.10/32 898649 451252 785360 10.21.12.1
10.10.10.10/32 37034<< 451252 833274 10.21.12.1
freertr-asbr21#show mpls forwarding
label vrf iface hop label
targets bytes
37034<< v1:4 ethernet3 10.21.12.1 451252 833274 0
freertr-asbr21#show mpls forwarding 37034
category value
label 37034
key vrfUni-vrf unicast <<<
working true
forwarder v1:4
interface ethernet3
nexthop 10.21.12.1
remote label 451252 833274 // SWAP 833274 THEN PUSH 451252
Juniper Business Use Only
Juniper Business Use Only
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/27/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai, 02/27/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Krzysztof Szarkowicz, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Natrajan Venkataraman, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Natrajan Venkataraman, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Natrajan Venkataraman, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Krzysztof Szarkowicz, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai, 02/27/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.