Subject: Rare project developers
List archive
- From: mc36 <>
- To: Frédéric LOUI <>, Natrajan Venkataraman <>, "" <>
- Subject: [rare-dev] Fwd: BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 00:02:50 +0100
frederic, please invite natz to the team's github!
thanks,
cs
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 23:00:37 +0000
From: Natrajan Venkataraman <>
Reply-To:
To: mc36 <>, <>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <>, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>, Anton Elita <>
CC: Reshma Das <>
Yes. Sure,
Its <>
Thanks,
-Nats-
*From: *mc36 <>
*Date: *Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 2:58 PM
*To: *Natrajan Venkataraman <>, <>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <>, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>, Anton Elita <>
*Cc: *Reshma Das <>
*Subject: *Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
hi natrajan,
btw i just realized that it was you who hacked who provided the code?
would you mind joining the team @ github? if yess, please give us your
github handle and frederic will invite you too to be able to contribute
directly! :)
thanks,
cs
On 2/28/23 23:13, mc36 wrote:
hi,<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/commit/509a5ada3ee69c47227583a06ca23f1709181de3__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GFj6D2gei3RHnHIHNnTMM3v4iAvIr4RH1zRe5I0ivIHBY_QTxa0hztpVKLXfamnsFGKXOA$>
you're crazy good! i never ever thought that you really will contribute code
fixes to freerouter... :)
so yesss the missing addUpdatedTable() calls yeahh.... i just realized that a
lot more were missing there,
this was my first idea:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/commit/509a5ada3ee69c47227583a06ca23f1709181de3__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GFj6D2gei3RHnHIHNnTMM3v4iAvIr4RH1zRe5I0ivIHBY_QTxa0hztpVKLXfamnsFGKXOA$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/commit/1aeb9410d51eb530450859107e2834ffce63d106__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GFj6D2gei3RHnHIHNnTMM3v4iAvIr4RH1zRe5I0ivIHBY_QTxa0hztpVKLXfamnfDDsuJg$>
here the labelled and the ipv6-labelled-over-v4 and ipv6-ctp-over-v4 were
also missing...
but then i checked the tabRoute.addUpdatedTable code that it does not have
any clue if
the afi is even active so it would add the same prefix multiple times so
instead i came
up with this:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/commit/1aeb9410d51eb530450859107e2834ffce63d106__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GFj6D2gei3RHnHIHNnTMM3v4iAvIr4RH1zRe5I0ivIHBY_QTxa0hztpVKLXfamnfDDsuJg$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgpVrfRtr.java*L300__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbMIvNA46$> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgpVrfRtr.java*L300__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbMIvNA46$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgpVrfRtr.java*L300__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbMIvNA46$>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgpVrfRtr.java*L300__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbMIvNA46$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgpVrfRtr.java*L300__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbMIvNA46$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgpVrfRtr.java*L300__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbMIvNA46$>>>
basically the main idea is that i check if the afi is active and call the
addUpdatedTable()
only if the proper afi was negotiated, so each prefix will be added only
once... could you
please check if this still works for you? (just asking because this part of
the code only
reachable if you configured soft-reconfig-inbound which is somewhat uncommon
after the
widespread of route-refresh message...)
regarding the bgp invalid update, and your side complained about the
malformed header, then
i quickly decoded and it's a 15936 bytes update whereas bgp allows only 4096
soo you're right... :)
well, it's a huge dump and what we're staring at is a result of a series of
other events that
resulted in this invalid update message... it's hard to reconstruct just from
this so can i ask
you as you already can reproduce it, do the following to the freerouter:
router bgp4 1
dump mrt ./bgp4.mrt
neighbor all.you.have.here dump mrt
and let it run for a hour to collect enough updates and series of events to
be able to see what could be the cause?
then i can do a lot more with this:
"packet mrt2pcap aaa.mrt zzz.pcap" or even more fun: "packet mrt2bgp will replay
..."
in the lab then hopefully your stream wull hit the same invalid update as a
result... :)
ps:
while the ci-cd runs against the second commit, i was thinking and i have the
idea that
the latest-greatest (with the check for the double addition to the table)
will solve the
huuge update problem, but let's see.... :)
thanks,
cs
On 2/28/23 22:02, Natrajan Venkataraman wrote:
Hi Csaba/All,
There is some exciting news to share.
FreeRTR transits traffic colorfully!
The configs/code-change/bug-report can be found in the attachments.
Topology:
CE1 (10.1.1.1)
|
[PE11----P1----ASBR11] AS1: JUNOS
|
|
AS2: FREERTR [ASBR21----P2----ASBR22]
|
|
AS3: JUNOS [ASBR31----P3----PE31]
|
(10.11.11.11) CE2
AS1, AS3: PE/ASBR have RSVP Gold and Bronze tunnels towards each other.
Free Router Deployment and Config:
ASBR11
|EBGP-CT
|
| IBGP-CT IBGP-CT
V1:ISIS,LDP
ASBR21---------P2(RR)---------ASBR22
V1:ISIS1,LDP V1:ISIS,LDP |
V2:ISIS2,LDP
|EBGP-CT
V3:ISIS3,LDP
ASBR31
ASBR21:
CT routes learned from ASBR22 will resolve based on the following
route-policy to VRF V2 and V3 based on color via
LDP with ISIS2 and ISIS3 respectively
CT routes will be advertised from V2 and V3 post resolution.
vrf definition v2
rd 68106:168427528
clr4import 100
clr4export 100
clr6import 100
clr6export 100
label4mode per-prefix
label6mode per-prefix
exit
!
vrf definition v3
rd 68106:168427529
clr4import 200
clr4export 200
clr6import 200
clr6export 200
label4mode per-prefix
label6mode per-prefix
exit
!
route-policy ibgp-in
sequence 10 if extcomm 2562:0:100
sequence 20 set vrf v2 ipv4
sequence 30 pass
sequence 40 enif
sequence 50 if extcomm 2562:0:200
sequence 60 set vrf v3 ipv4
sequence 70 pass
sequence 80 enif
sequence 90 drop
exit
router bgp4 1
vrf v1
local-as 64512
router-id 10.21.21.21
no safe-ebgp
address-family unicast
nexthop recursion 3
!
neighbor 10.11.121.1 remote-as 64511
neighbor 10.11.121.1 local-as 64512
neighbor 10.11.121.1 address-family ctp
neighbor 10.11.121.1 distance 20
neighbor 10.11.121.1 send-community standard extended
!
neighbor 10.20.20.20 remote-as 64512
neighbor 10.20.20.20 local-as 64512
neighbor 10.20.20.20 address-family ctp
neighbor 10.20.20.20 distance 200
neighbor 10.20.20.20 update-source loopback0
neighbor 10.20.20.20 traffeng
neighbor 10.20.20.20 send-community standard extended
neighbor 10.20.20.20 route-policy-in ibgp-in
!
afi-clr v2 enable
afi-clr v2 redistribute bgp4 1
!
afi-clr v3 enable
afi-clr v3 redistribute bgp4 1
!
freertr-asbr21(cfg)#show ipv4 route v1
typ prefix
metric iface
hop time
B 10.10.10.10/32 68106:168427528 200/0
ethernet3@v2:4<< 10.21.12.1 00:09:43
B 10.10.10.10/32 68106:168427529 200/0
ethernet3@v3:4<< 10.21.12.1 00:09:43
NOTE: This needed code modification in FreeRtR to have the
route-policy-in apply for CTP family.
The code diff is attached.
freertr-asbr21#show mpls forwarding
label vrf iface hop
label targets
bytes
702088 v2:4 ethernet4 10.21.22.1
727749(LDP-PUSH),235868(CT-SWAP) 0
942958 v3:4 ethernet5 10.21.32.1
727749(LDP-PUSH),700462(CT-SWAP) 865368
ASBR22:
CT routes learned from ASBR21 will resolve via best effort
LDP in V1 (Same as previous BGP-CT InterOp Demo)
BUGS:
@ASBR-21: ASBR11-ASBR21 EBGP session flap due to Bad Packet
from FreeRTR to JUNOS.
This issue does not arise when the config is initially loaded
but about 5 minutes since the EBGP session towards ASBR11
comes up. The initial CT advertisements go correctly with
right encoding and packet length and ASBR11 accepts and
forms the End-to-End Path. Ping succeeded on End to End Path.
However, ASBR11 after ~5 mins, gets malformed update from
FreeRTR and terminates the session. This needs to be fixed.
I have attached the malformed packet and full-configs.
Thanks,
-Nats-
*From: *mc36 <>
*Date: *Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 11:29 AM
*To: * <>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz
<>, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>, Natrajan
Venkataraman
<>, Anton Elita <>
*Cc: *Reshma Das <>
*Subject: *Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
it took more than expected sorry....
please find attached the topology what i now pretty sure will work with the 2
ebgp vpnv4 and 1 bgp-ct for the colors...
at this time i used more descriptive vrf names like core, blue (a color of
the core) red (same) and cust[1,2]
the cpes (r1, r2, r6, r7) are dump default route, the r3 is a single pe, have
a ebgp-bgp-ct and 2 ebgp-vpnv4,
whereas r4 have just ebgp-bgp-ct, plus isis toward r5... r5 have ibgp-bgp-ct
to r4, plus ebgp-vpnv4 to r3...
when i initiate some ping flood, i see different counters in "display mpls
forwarding" in r4 so they're separated...
r1#ping 3.3.3.5 vrf cust1 size 1111 repeat 11111111
r2#ping 4.4.4.5 vrf cust2 size 1111 repeat 11111111
now i have some smaller stuff but soon i'll study if i can add the "afi-vrf cust1
resolve-in blue" easily or not :)))
thanks,
cs
On 2/28/23 11:16, Krzysztof Szarkowicz wrote:
+Anton
--
Krzysztof Grzegorz Szarkowicz, JAWS PLM, Solutions Architect | Phone: +49 89
203 012 127
Please consider my current time zone, when calling: CET (UTC+01:00)
https://easylink.juniper.net/slicing <https://easylink.juniper.net/slicing>
<https://easylink.juniper.net/slicing <https://easylink.juniper.net/slicing>>
*From: *mc36 <>
*Date: *Tuesday, 2023-02-28:Tu at 11:09
*To: *Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>, Natrajan Venkataraman
<>
*Cc: *Reshma Das <>,
<>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <>
*Subject: *Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
hi,
after a quick look at the vrf import routine, this is where the nexthop's
table is set:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgpVrfRtr.java*L300__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbMIvNA46$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgp.java*L2690__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbHBkgr18$> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgp.java*L2690__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbHBkgr18$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgp.java*L2690__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbHBkgr18$>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgp.java*L2690__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbHBkgr18$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgp.java*L2690__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbHBkgr18$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgp.java*L2690__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbHBkgr18$>>>
maybe a new variable int that class like (afi-vrf blue) "underlays <vrf1>
[vrf2]...[vrfn]" will do the trick permanently...
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/master/src/net/freertr/rtr/rtrBgp.java*L2690__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Hlv7SV6fqBveGXhRqzVJ0LNnqBQztmRhbiz326LViyZKETqIWnRNylAXw0tkX6-h2IHVbHBkgr18$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.freertr.org/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_NBOxPhg$>
i'll experiment with that after i brought up the currently planned eantc
topology.... :)
br,
cs
On 2/28/23 10:31, mc36 wrote:
> hi,
>
> i did some real quick tests and this is really just what i said
initially,
>
> so the original bgp behavior with the next-hop-unchanged toward route
reflectors...
>
> now i'll play a bit with my original idea about the two ebgp between
pe1 and pe2 in the eantc topology...
>
> that one is im pretty sure will work for the interop event, and as
we'll be onsite, after we configured up everything real quick,
>
> we could hack together on something that lifts this 2 ebgp
requirement in freerouter... :)
>
> thanks,
>
> cs
>
>
> On 2/27/23 22:37, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai wrote:
>> Those are kind words Csaba
. I
m glad we are in the right direction.
>>
>>> i'll try that asap !
>>
>> Cool!. Will wait for your experiment. Fingers crossed.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kaliraj
>>
>> *From: *mc36 <>
>> *Date: *Monday, February 27, 2023 at 11:37 AM
>> *To: *Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>, Natrajan Venkataraman
<>
>> *Cc: *Reshma Das <>,
<>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <>
>> *Subject: *Re: BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution
>>
>> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>>
>>
>> + krzysztof && rare-dev as it's a core rare-dev question, thanks
you!!!
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> you're crazy good, seemingly you know my shit better than me....
:)))))))
>>
>> so that nexthop recursive was added when i given support for the
original bgp behavior of nexthop processing:
>>
>> that is, when you no-next-hop-self toward the route reflectors on
your peering node...
>>
>> freerouter by default assumes next-hop-self without that knob
configured...
>>
>> but you're right, basically that recursive knob could be reused for
the bgp-ct then i wont need two ebgp at eantc tests....
>>
>> i'll try that asap !
>>
>> ps: i <3 your private build XDDD
>>
>> thanks,
>> cs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/23 19:56, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai wrote:
>>> Also, Csaba
>>>
>>> Just some random observations:
>>>
>>> This config looks interesting:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> r4(cfg-rtr)#neighbor 2.2.2.3 address-family vpnuni
>>> r4(cfg-rtr)#ne?
>>>
neighbor
- specify neighbor parameters
>>> *
nexthop
- specify next
hop tracking parameter*
>>>
>>> r4(cfg-rtr)#nexthop ?
>>>
prefix-list
- filter next hops
>>> *recursion
-
specify recursion depth*
>>>
route-map
- filter next hops
>>>
route-policy - filter next hops
>>>
>>> r4(cfg-rtr)#nexthop recursion ?
>>>
<num> -
maximum rounds
>>>
>>> r4(cfg-rtr)#nexthop recursion 4
>>>
>>> and, from the code, this function arguments:
>>>
>>>
/**
>>>
>>>
* fix nexthops
on a route entry
>>>
>>>
*
>>>
>>>
* @param <T> class of address
>>>
>>>
* @param imp
route entry to update
>>>
>>> *
* @param recurs where to look up nexthops recursively*
>>>
>>> *
* @param nexthops table where look up resolved nexthops*
>>>
>>>
* @param recurn
maximum recursion depth
>>>
>>>
* @return true
if failed, false if ready
>>>
>>>
*/
>>>
>>>
public static <T extends addrType> boolean
doNexthopFix(tabRouteEntry<T> imp, tabRoute<T> recurs, tabRoute<T>
nexthops, int recurn) {
>>>
>>>
(in tabRoute.java)
>>>
>>> if we pass in the color vrf table v2 as
recurs
argument, will that result in doing bgp nexthop resolution based on entries
in that v2 table only?
>>>
>>> Basically,
>>>
>>> * from CLI,
configure a
community -> color-vrf/table
mapping.
>>> * When
route is received, based on community, pick the color-table, and pass it as
recurs
in the above function.
>>> * That
should result in resolving bgp nexthop over rsvp/ldp routes in that color-table?
>>>
>>> Then we wouldn
t need the import policy to match on RD and set vrf nexthop. And this
method may work for all bgp families.
>>>
>>> I have a dev setup with freeRtr code ready, where I wanted to
experiment doing the above. Just wanted to update you.
>>>
>>> You can tell if I am understanding the code right, or if I am going
in wrong direction. Also, if you agree with the concept,
>>>
>>> You will be able to code it faster.
>>>
>>> bash-3.2$ dk rtr0
>>>
>>> root@edc770cfeb8a:/opt/freertr# telnet localhost 2323
>>>
>>> Trying 127.0.0.1...
>>>
>>> Connected to localhost.
>>>
>>> Escape character is '^]'.
>>>
>>> welcome
>>>
>>> line ready
>>>
>>> freertr#show ver
>>>
>>> freeRouter v23.2.25-cur, done by cs@nop.
>>>
>>> *private build - kaliraj -*****
>>>
>>> place on the web: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.freertr.org/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_NBOxPhg$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.freertr.org/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_NBOxPhg$>><https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.freertr.org/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_NBOxPhg$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.freertr.org/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_NBOxPhg$>>><https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.freertr.org/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_NBOxPhg$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.freertr.org/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_NBOxPhg$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.freertr.org/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_NBOxPhg$>>>>>><https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.freertr.org/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_NBOxPhg$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.freertr.org/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_NBOxPhg$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.freertr.org/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_NBOxPhg$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_M31zlre$>>>>
>>> license: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_M31zlre$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_M31zlre$>><https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_M31zlre$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_M31zlre$>>><https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_M31zlre$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_M31zlre$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_M31zlre$>>>>>><https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_M31zlre$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_M31zlre$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!H3SnIGYzFbrhxrhXtZ2diMvam2kBs7WeQgDvTqgTCewafLQi7u86cFptGheS5qQy_M31zlre$
>>>
>>> quote1: make the world better
>>>
>>> I just got started, able to modify the version string and see the
result.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Kaliraj
>>>
>>> *From: *Natrajan Venkataraman <>
>>> *Date: *Saturday, February 25, 2023 at 11:52 AM
>>> *To: *mc36 <>
>>> *Cc: *Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>, Reshma Das
<>
>>> *Subject: *BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution
>>>
>>> Hi Csaba,
>>>
>>> We tried experimenting the new free-rtr code for colorful
resolution with the configuration that you had shared. However we are hitting a few
roadblocks that needs to be
addressed
>>> in free-rtr code.
>>>
>>> The topology is as same as the demo that was performed in IETF 115
where resolution was happening via LDP best effort for BGP CT route in ASBR21 received
from ASBR22
(10.22.22.22).
>>> However, we modified the demo based on the configs shared by you
for colorful resolution.
>>>
>>> We have attached the Old and New configs for your reference for
ASBR21. Rest of the configs (P2, ASR22) are more or less the same. You can refer to
the topology from the demo
>>> video.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Nats-
>>>
>>> DETAILS:
>>>
>>> ````````````
>>>
>>> THIS IS THE NON-WORKING CASE WITH RSVP:
>>>
>>> =======================================
>>>
>>> The following is the summary list of what we are trying to achieve
>>>
>>> @ ASBR 21,
>>>
>>> - Configure VRF V2 and V3 to import based on BGP-CT RD/RT
>>>
>>> freertr-asbr21#show running-config vrf v2
>>>
>>> vrf definition v2
>>>
>>> rd 68106:168427528
>>>
>>> rt4import 68106:168427528
>>>
>>> rt6import 68106:168427528
>>>
>>> exit
>>>
>>> freertr-asbr21#show running-config vrf v3
>>>
>>> vrf definition v3
>>>
>>> rd 68106:168427529
>>>
>>> rt4import 68106:168427529
>>>
>>> rt6import 68106:168427529
>>>
>>> exit
>>>
>>> - We created RSVP tunnels tunnel1 and tunnel2 in VRF v2 and v3
respectively (However we keep tunnel VRF same as forwarding VRF)
>>>
>>> freertr-asbr21#show running-config interface tunnel1
>>>
>>> interface tunnel1
>>>
>>> description lsp_asbr21_asbr22
>>>
>>> tunnel vrf v2
>>>
>>> tunnel source loopback2
>>>
>>> tunnel destination 10.22.22.22
>>>
>>> tunnel mode p2pte
>>>
>>> vrf forwarding v2
>>>
>>> ipv4 address 10.121.121.121 255.255.255.0
>>>
>>> mpls enable
>>>
>>> no shutdown
>>>
>>> no log-link-change
>>>
>>> exit
>>>
>>> freertr-asbr21#show running-config interface tunnel2
>>>
>>> interface tunnel2
>>>
>>> description lsp_asbr21_asbr22
>>>
>>> tunnel vrf v3
>>>
>>> tunnel source loopback3
>>>
>>> tunnel destination 10.22.22.22
>>>
>>> tunnel mode p2pte
>>>
>>> vrf forwarding v3
>>>
>>> ipv4 address 10.221.221.221 255.255.255.0
>>>
>>> mpls enable
>>>
>>> no shutdown
>>>
>>> no log-link-change
>>>
>>> exit
>>>
>>> !
>>>
>>> freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 rsvp v2 summary
>>>
>>> source
id
>>> subgroup
id target
id
description
>>>
>>> 10.121.21.21
8906
>>> ::
0
10.22.22.22
902663016
freertr-asbr21:tunnel1
>>>
>>> freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 rsvp v3 summary
>>>
>>> source
>>> id
subgroup
id target
id
description
>>>
>>> 10.221.21.21
12715
>>> ::
0
10.22.22.22
793731422
freertr-asbr21:tunnel2
>>>
>>> - Then we added static routes for 10.22.22.22 in V2 and V3 to point
to tunnel1 and tunnel2.
>>>
>>>
(This we assume, prevents the need
for rewriting the nexthop in policy ibpg-in)
>>>
>>>
freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 route v2
>>>
>>>
typ
prefix
metric iface
>>>
hop
time
>>>
>>>
S
10.22.22.22/32
1/0
tunnel1
10.121.121.122
02:19:56
>>>
>>>
freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 route v3
>>>
>>>
typ
prefix
metric iface
>>>
hop
time
>>>
>>>
S
10.22.22.22/32
1/0
tunnel2
10.221.221.222
02:20:18
>>>
>>> - Then we added policy ibgp-in to filter BGP CT routes to resolve
on VRFs V2 and V3 based on RD
>>>
>>>
(However we found that the
following policy is not applying on the BGP CT routes, therefore BGP CT routes do not
have a way to set their
respective resolving
VRFs V2 and
>>> V3)
>>>
>>>
freertr-asbr21(cfg)#show
running-config route-policy ibgp-in
>>>
>>> route-policy ibgp-in
>>>
>>> sequence 10 if rd 68106:168427528
>>>
>>> sequence 20
set vrf v2 ipv4
>>>
>>> sequence 30
pass
>>>
>>> sequence 40 enif
>>>
>>> sequence 50 if rd 68106:168427529
>>>
>>> sequence 60
set vrf v3 ipv4
>>>
>>> sequence 70
pass
>>>
>>> sequence 80 enif
>>>
>>> sequence 90 drop
>>>
>>> exit
>>>
>>> !
>>>
>>>
router bgp4 1
>>>
>>> neighbor 10.20.20.20 route-policy-in ibgp-in
>>>
>>> neighbor 10.20.20.20 vpn-route-policy-in ibgp-in <<<
>>>
>>> What we are looking for is an installation of SWAP + PUSH for
BGP-CT (SWAP) over RSVP (PUSH) similar to the working scenario (Option B) instead of
what is being tried
above which
>>> we assume is (Option A + B). The following section depicts the
working case and expected behavior.
>>>
>>> THIS IS THE WORKING CASE WITH LDP:
>>>
>>> ==================================
>>>
>>> freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 bgp 1 ctp database
>>>
>>>
prefix
hop metric
>>> aspath
>>>
>>> 10.2.2.2/32 68098:33685512
10.11.121.1
20/100/0/0
64511
>>>
>>> 10.2.2.2/32 68098:33685513
10.11.121.1
20/100/0/0
64511
>>>
>>> 10.10.10.10/32 68106:168427528
10.22.22.22
200/100/0/0
64513
>>>
>>> 10.10.10.10/32 68106:168427529
10.22.22.22 200/100/0/0
64513 <<<<<
>>>
>>> freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 bgp 1 ctp database 10.10.10.10/32
68106:168427529
>>>
>>> id
category
value
>>>
>>>
vrf
v1:4
>>>
>>>
ipver
4
>>>
>>>
rd
68106:168427529
>>>
>>> alt0
nexthop
10.22.22.22
>>>
>>> alt0
extended community
2562:0:200
>>>
>>> alt0 remote label
833274 <<<<<
>>>
>>> Here, the local labels are seen as part of the LDP database.
>>>
>>> freertr-asbr21#show ipv4 ldp v1 database
>>>
>>> prefix
local
remote
hop
>>>
>>> 10.10.10.10/32
898649
451252 785360
10.21.12.1
>>>
>>> 10.10.10.10/32
37034<< 451252 833274
10.21.12.1
>>>
>>> freertr-asbr21#show mpls forwarding
>>>
>>> label
vrf
iface
hop
label
targets bytes
>>>
>>> 37034<< v1:4
ethernet3
10.21.12.1
451252
833274
0
>>>
>>> freertr-asbr21#show mpls forwarding 37034
>>>
>>> category
value
>>>
>>>
label
37034
>>>
>>>
key
vrfUni-vrf unicast <<<
>>>
>>> working
true
>>>
>>> forwarder
v1:4
>>>
>>> interface
ethernet3
>>>
>>> nexthop
10.21.12.1
>>>
>>> remote label
451252 833274 // SWAP 833274 THEN PUSH 451252
>>>
>>> Juniper Business Use Only
>>>
>>>
>>> Juniper Business Use Only
>>>
>>
>>
>> Juniper Business Use Only
>>
Juniper Business Use Only
Juniper Business Use Only
Juniper Business Use Only
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, (continued)
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Natrajan Venkataraman, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Natrajan Venkataraman, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Natrajan Venkataraman, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Natrajan Venkataraman, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, Natrajan Venkataraman, 02/28/2023
- [rare-dev] Fwd: BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
- Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution, mc36, 02/28/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.