Subject: Rare project developers
List archive
- From: mc36 <>
- To: , Cristina Klippel Dominicini <>
- Subject: Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:12:17 +0200
ps: thanks for the math pdf you sent me a year ago or so...
we learnt math in hungarian so it really helped me a lot!
On 8/29/22 16:06, mc36 wrote:
thanks for confirming the reception of the mail...
and thanks for taking care of the question...
please take your time, it have a good change that
i\m not right so dont put too much effort into it,
just if it really catches an interest somewhere....
thanks,
cs
On 8/29/22 16:01, Cristina Klippel Dominicini wrote:
Hi Csaba!
Sorry for the delay. For some reason, I am not receiving all the threads from
the rare list, and my mail server also blocked some messages. I will check
the archives.
Interesting question! I am honored by your mention as a skilled mathematician, but I am more a computer engineering trying to understand and apply the math concepts to computing problems :-D But I have some very skilled mathematician friends that help me when I have some doubts. I will check with them if they have any insights about your question and get back to you soon :-)
Best regards,
Cristina
________________________________________
De: <> em nome de
mc36 <>
Enviado: sexta-feira, 26 de agosto de 2022 06:45
Para: Cristina Klippel Dominicini
Cc:
Assunto: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh
hi,
can i ask you to help me solve a long lived question of me please:
(i ask you because you're the only well skilled mathematician i know)
(if it's outside of your interest, please forward it someone)
which is harder to find out both a and b:
( (g^a)^b) % p == ( (g^b)^a) % p
where g is 2 or 5, p is a 8192 bit prime, both well known, a and b are both
secrets
here we are talking about positive integers
or
a*b == b*a
here the computation is performed over 448bit elliptic curves
my reasoning is that reversing the multiplication should be easier than
solving the discrete logarithm problem
i see that it is an apples to oranges kind of question so a weak conjecture
is much more than enough
thanks,
cs
________________________________
Esta mensagem (incluindo anexos) cont m informa o confidencial destinada a um usu rio espec fico e seu conte do protegido por lei. Se voc n o o destinat rio correto deve apagar esta mensagem.
O emitente desta mensagem respons vel por seu conte do e endere
amento.
Cabe ao destinat rio cuidar quanto ao tratamento adequado. A divulga o, reprodu o e/ou distribui o sem a devida autoriza o ou qualquer outra a o sem conformidade com as normas internas do Ifes s o proibidas e pass veis de san o disciplinar, c vel e criminal.
- [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, mc36, 08/26/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, Cristina Klippel Dominicini, 08/29/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, mc36, 08/29/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, mc36, 08/29/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, Cristina Klippel Dominicini, 08/29/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, Cristina Klippel Dominicini, 08/29/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, mc36, 08/30/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, mc36, 08/30/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, mc36, 08/30/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, mc36, 08/30/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, Tim Chown, 08/30/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, Cristina Klippel Dominicini, 08/29/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, mc36, 08/29/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, mc36, 08/29/2022
- Re: [rare-dev] ecdh vs dh, Cristina Klippel Dominicini, 08/29/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.