Rare project developers

[Frédéric LOUI <>]

NAT example:
https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_nat.p4#106

> I think they are if you use "from_hw = True" when reading the
> entry. That's what I'm doing in the packet broker.

I’ll re-test with "from_hw = True », but IIRC (it was along time ago, when we 
implemented our first counter) 
it was not reporting counter consistently.


> Le 17 févr. 2022 à 15:45, Alexander Gall <> a écrit :
> 
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:28:29 +0100, Frédéric LOUI 
> <> said:
> 
>> Which SDE are you using ?
> 
> 9.7.1
> 
>> I’m using SDE 9.7.0 and did not see these errors …
> 
>> Basically, operations_execute() sync counters tied to a table.
> 
> Yes, but these counters are *not* tied to tables, are they? They are
> indirect counters (e.g. pkt_out_stats in ig_ctl.p4).
> 
>> If you don’t yield this primitive counters belonging to tables are not 
>> updated at all.
> 
> I think they are if you use "from_hw = True" when reading the
> entry. That's what I'm doing in the packet broker.
> 
>> I tried to upgrade my WEDGE to 9.8.0 but it seems that I have the issues 
>> now …
>> I’ll get back to you as soon ass as I can solve this upgrade issue.
> 
> For the record: I don't see this happening in my 9.8.0 build.
> 
> --
> Alex
> 
>>> Le 17 févr. 2022 à 15:17, Alexander Gall <> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hi Frederic
>>> 
>>> The current bf-forwarder code generates these persistent errors (every
>>> 5 seconds) in bf_switchd:
>>> 
>>> Feb 15 12:14:22 spare-PB1 bf_switchd[26808]: 2022-02-15 12:14:22.995012 
>>> ERROR  (BF_BFRT:(file=null):(func=null):0) - server_op_cb:151 Unable to 
>>> retrieve bound_program data for client with id 3
>>> Feb 15 12:14:27 spare-PB1 bf_switchd[26808]: 2022-02-15 12:14:27.944791 
>>> ERROR  (BF_BFRT:(file=null):(func=null):0) - 
>>> tableOperationWaitForCompletion:3374 Timed out waiting for completion of 
>>> operation for table -2081122291
>>> 
>>> It appears that this error is caused by
>>> 
>>> tbl_stats_in.operations_execute(self.bfgc.target, 
>>> 'Sync',p4_name=self.bfgc.p4_name)
>>> tbl_stats_out.operations_execute(self.bfgc.target, 
>>> 'Sync',p4_name=self.bfgc.p4_name)
>>> tbl_stats_pkt_out.operations_execute(self.bfgc.target, 
>>> 'Sync',p4_name=self.bfgc.p4_name)
>>> 
>>> in rare/bf_subifcounter/__init__.py. I'm not familiar with
>>> operations_execute() but I'm a bit confused by the fact that these
>>> objects are not tables but indirect counters.  Does
>>> operations_execute() apply to counters too?
>>> 
>>> Also, what would be the benefit of the Sync operation compared to
>>> using "from_hw = True" when reading the counters?
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Alex
>>>