Skip to Content.

rare-dev - Re: [rare-dev] BF_BFRT Errors

Subject: Rare project developers

List archive


Re: [rare-dev] BF_BFRT Errors


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Frédéric LOUI <>
  • To: Alexander Gall <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [rare-dev] BF_BFRT Errors
  • Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:21:12 +0100
  • Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmtaauth01.partage.renater.fr 8E1F81401B5


> Yes, that *is* a direct counter attached to a table, but the three
> counters I mentioned are *not*. That's the point.
Oh sorry, I read your email too quickly :(
These three were the very first counter and these are not attached to a table
(used to report subintf )

> Ok, I can't guarantee that I've seen it working consistently. I'd have
> to verify that.
I’ll retry with latest SDE 9.8.0. If it works, I’ll switch back to "from_hw =
True"
Will keep you posted...

> Le 17 févr. 2022 à 16:06, Alexander Gall <> a écrit :
>
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:56:38 +0100, Frédéric LOUI
> <> said:
>
>> NAT example:
>> https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_nat.p4#106
>
> Yes, that *is* a direct counter attached to a table, but the three
> counters I mentioned are *not*. That's the point.
>
>>> I think they are if you use "from_hw = True" when reading the
>>> entry. That's what I'm doing in the packet broker.
>
>> I’ll re-test with "from_hw = True », but IIRC (it was along time ago, when
>> we implemented our first counter)
>> it was not reporting counter consistently.
>
> Ok, I can't guarantee that I've seen it working consistently. I'd have
> to verify that.
>
> --
> Alex




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page