Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Assessment of Romania / RoEduNetID for eduGAIN Membership

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive

Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Assessment of Romania / RoEduNetID for eduGAIN Membership


Chronological Thread 
  • From: 振溶[Jinyong Jo] <jinyong.jo AT gmail.com>
  • To: Valeriu Vraciu <valeriu AT roedu.net>
  • Cc: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter AT restena.lu>, Brook Schofield <brook.schofield AT geant.org>, "edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org" <edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org>, Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas AT roedu.net>
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Assessment of Romania / RoEduNetID for eduGAIN Membership
  • Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:57:39 +0900

Hello,
 
Is this a good/valid approach, with decisions made by upper staff, or we
should rethink and find another way?

Constituting a committee comprised of external/internal expertise would be helpful for securing neutrality as well as the uptake of the federation services. However, because each federation has different situation, I think that the decision should be done by each federation. Maintaining a committee can be a very big challenging for the small federations like us. My point was that, no matter what the decision is, the policy document should reflect the decision of your federation. 
 
Kind Regards,
Jinyong Jo



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page