Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Assessment of Romania / RoEduNetID for eduGAIN Membership

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive

Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Assessment of Romania / RoEduNetID for eduGAIN Membership


Chronological Thread 
  • From: 振溶[Jinyong Jo] <jinyong.jo AT gmail.com>
  • To: Valeriu Vraciu <valeriu AT roedu.net>
  • Cc: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter AT restena.lu>, Brook Schofield <brook.schofield AT geant.org>, "edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org" <edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org>, Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas AT roedu.net>
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Assessment of Romania / RoEduNetID for eduGAIN Membership
  • Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 10:51:10 +0900

Hello all,

One more comment: 

It seems that the Governance body has changed to AARNIEC (from a committee) if my memory is correct; i am looking into the doc ver. 0.92.
Is the AARNIEC both the governor and the operator of the RoEduNetID then? If right,the policy document should be refined more.
The document states as if the governance body and the operation body were separate (e.g. "Deciding future directions and enhancements for the Federation together with the Federation Operator who prepares the plans", "Approving changes to the Federation Policy prepared by the Federation Operator", and more).

Kind Regards,
Jinyong Jo


2019년 3월 14일 (목) 오후 9:23, Valeriu Vraciu <valeriu AT roedu.net>님이 작성:
Removed that statement from website too.

On 14/03/19 14:14, Stefan Winter wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Removed this requirement related to uniqueness of IdP per institution.
>> There can be large entities that have several components, each one with
>> own authentication systems (thinking about the Romanian Academy which
>> has many institutes, but maybe community has other examples ?).
>
> Your website still states that only one IdP per participant is allowed:
>
> https://eduid.roedu.net/membership/
>
> "In order to maintain consistency, only one IdP per institution is
> accepted."
>
> On the substance of the question, it's probably a wise idea to change
> the website to be in line with a policy that *allows* multiple IdPs per
> participant.
>
> One trivial example (which I see occuring in real life) is that an
> organisation wants to upgrade/switch their IdP software without
> endangering production use. They would typically add a "testing" IdP
> alongside the production one for a while.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Stefan Winter
>

--
Valeriu Vraciu
RoEduNet




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page