Skip to Content.

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN and non "academic" IdPs

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive


Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN and non "academic" IdPs


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <trscavo AT internet2.edu>
  • To: Andy Bennett <andyjpb AT knodium.com>
  • Cc: "edugain-discuss AT geant.net" <edugain-discuss AT geant.net>
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN and non "academic" IdPs
  • Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 13:54:36 -0500
  • Authentication-results: prod-mail.geant.net (amavisd-new); dkim=pass header.i= AT gmail.com
  • List-archive: <https://mail.geant.net/mailman/private/edugain-discuss/>
  • List-id: eduGAIN discussion list <edugain-discuss.geant.net>

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Andy Bennett <andyjpb AT knodium.com> wrote:
>
> Whilst there's a good case for some ECs in relation to the legal
> commitments of the entities themselves (i.e. around data protection),
> and this naturally makes implications about which data (attributes) are
> suitable to release, we should be very careful how ECs proliferate.

Entity Categories *will* proliferate, and I think that's a good thing.

> Adding an EC for things which aren't directly related to the entities
> themselves can put the details in the wrong place and this will only
> increase the complexity of an already very complex system.

I totally agree with you, Andy. Seems we're talking about
organizational categories, not entity categories, in which case we're
really discussing metadata registration practices.

Tom





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page