An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

[Nicole Harris <harris AT terena.org>]

And all I'm saying is a good test is one that understands that
something is failing because TOU are not being adhered to. Nothing
more. I would add that to your good test list.

Sent from my iPhone

> On 29 jun. 2014, at 11:19, Peter Schober <peter.schober AT univie.ac.at> wrote:
>
> * Nicole Harris <harris AT terena.org> [2014-06-29 11:48]:
>> He is using metadata that is not being provided via edugain as part of
>> the tool.
>
> 1. FWIW, there is no mention of "eduGAIN" anywhere on that tool.
>
> 2. Let's judge this by its (potential) merit and usefulness, not on
>   the selection of metadata URLs it currently gets fed.
>
> 3. Here's someone willing to contribute work and development effort to
>   better the federated UX for everyone. Let's SHOOT HIM DOWN because
>   he's not the (inter-)federation guru we all think we are!
>   I mean, SERIOUSLY, who does this guy think he is!!1!111!
>
> So I'd be more interested in agreeing on what a good test is (i.e.,
> what Miro said) and having now 2 tools to compare is an excellt way to
> form an opinion what we do like/want/need and what we don't.
>
> So it's all FTW, IMO.
> -peter
>