edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive

Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] The usefulness of "candidate" federations 2 years on.

From: Thomas Lenggenhager <lenggenhager AT switch.ch>
To: edugain-discuss AT geant.net
Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] The usefulness of "candidate" federations 2 years on.
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:54:17 +0200
List-archive: <https://mail.geant.net/mailman/private/edugain-discuss/>
List-id: eduGAIN discussion list <edugain-discuss.geant.net>
Organization: SWITCH

On 25.10.13 09:11, Lukas Hämmerle wrote:
> I would opt for listing the categories "eduGAIN members", "Joining" and
> "eduGAIN Candidate" and maybe "Other Known Federations".

I do not see a necessity to add the 'Other Known Federations' to the
eduGAIN status page. Better refer to the REFEDS pages for that instead
of doubling effort to keep the pages in sync.

As soon as a federation confirmed by e-mail (with no formal process
involved for that) that they are interested to be displayed as "eduGAIN
Candidate", they should be added there.

Thomas

--
SWITCH
------
Thomas Lenggenhager, Central Solutions
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zurich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 1505 direct +41 44 268 1541
http://switch.ch

[eduGAIN-discuss] The usefulness of "candidate" federations 2 years on., Brook Schofield, 24-Oct-2013
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] The usefulness of "candidate" federations 2 years on., Tomasz Wolniewicz, 24-Oct-2013
  - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] The usefulness of "candidate" federations 2 years on., Lukas Hämmerle, 25-Oct-2013
    - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] The usefulness of "candidate" federations 2 years on., Thomas Lenggenhager, 10/25/2013
      - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] The usefulness of "candidate" federations 2 years on., Ian Young, 25-Oct-2013