Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

rare-users - Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] Issues with actual FlowSpec filtering, especially for rules announced via exabgp (fwd)

Subject: RARE user and assistance email list

List archive

Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] Issues with actual FlowSpec filtering, especially for rules announced via exabgp (fwd)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "David Schmitz" <>
  • To: ,
  • Subject: Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] Issues with actual FlowSpec filtering, especially for rules announced via exabgp (fwd)
  • Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 10:04:46 +0200 (CEST)
  • List-id: <freertr.groups.io>
  • Mailing-list: list ; contact

Hi Csaba,

On Wed, 7 Jun 2023, mc36 wrote:

Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 09:52:51 +0200
From: mc36 <>
Reply-To: ,
To: David Schmitz <>,
Subject: Re: [freertr] Issues with actual FlowSpec filtering,
especially for rules announced via exabgp (fwd)

hmm and well, after some rest, if not flowspec v2 as suggested b4, flowspec for layer2 vpns like

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn/

should also happen, etc.. this seems a more active draft and a different bgp safi finally... :)
This is a good point.

I have no experience with FlowSpec v2.
I am not sure whether exabgp has support for it yet.

Let's see how we can progress regarding this in future...


look, flowspec v1 as is have ordering issues when it comes to applying it to the packets but you'll see this later...
Yes, FlowSpec v1 has several limitations, especially regarding ordering.

Best Regards
David


br,

cs

On 6/7/23 09:50, mc36 wrote:
hmmm and a question from me, do you using the http api or a xmlconfig (netconf 4 example) you tried b4?

thx,

cs

On 6/7/23 09:49, mc36 wrote:
well and after changing the originator node's acls/policymaps/whatever u do to originate,

the ipv4 bgp 1 recompile is a must, as none of these are have bindings to the rtr/rtrbgp* at all..

br,

cs

On 6/7/23 09:47, mc36 wrote:
okkk then, is this still persist if you decouple the flowspec-install/advertise nodes???

thx,

cs

On 6/7/23 08:33, David Schmitz wrote:

The actual issue was/is really only about the actual mitigation
by these received and installed FlowSpec rules
and it seemed to me that







--

David Schmitz

Boltzmannstrasse 1, 85748 Garching
Telefon: +49 89 35831-8765
Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Germany
Mail:




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1393): https://groups.io/g/freertr/message/1393
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/99364239/6413194
Group Owner:
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/freertr/unsub []
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page