Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

rare-users - Re: [RARE-users] RARE/Wedge BGP table size?

Subject: RARE user and assistance email list

List archive

Re: [RARE-users] RARE/Wedge BGP table size?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tim Chown <>
  • To: cs <>
  • Cc: Frédéric LOUI <>, Xavier Jeannin <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [RARE-users] RARE/Wedge BGP table size?
  • Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:35:02 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jisc.ac.uk; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=jisc.ac.uk; dkim=pass header.d=jisc.ac.uk; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=W5sB+6Hf9ZHGtrWG4n4sXBesL44qrNi7yTIEAGCrkFc=; b=e7tyArpOFW7DmAUb2Gj2UfXpdYL/hweAT0JhjknZgB0DjJrD8UzwicSmqQydA6ZuGTUj9FFU+4j+cB4XHOZYV0xJVrB3XF6WDVCjqfo7f+FJYFnzZHBnw1EU2T2ORnIhHjKkqOs8RftU6T/tQEPrpVbs0PUCWsNUK0FoE/iii1rRDfd+o63ZhVDMBEkfWdcW8w+5JOY+9IBpZbtySmS2sxEKBuSzQgj76hAGVmrtcJwicD3myaHAs7rqxiGdTyhscbav6aDc3gk2crOgex/486066gQtodGyKT/OKlNC/M2tyNC5FatzADLT0FK8P3Uym57sTY//GGZ8j3QCLBJJeQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bkfP1aHBkFjRNbmeNrWR1YBlDyLLQFjWJo8F4eESHiujnBG/hcwR58NXgj/0MlJMavH8q0hhagRicIQMrC/KScUPNxT1g3/e8KyZce3vYjU8YTfciBrxHi2WFaSoQSbL/C4j+eYmy9eWrvp8/C9B70mtTXC3zylJQY5IEb0vTrAvHwc+2wl/04XyXpkm9lfvvUPWgrdEEVw8Tbv+jGwsbYs153I8wb1hJzBLCb9mvJVndf1VP365Uawq3JMs1doPtnjShb7Hznyqpcz9KCC7HDTViOleJpVgUrJXxG3aBqqatTF0ElN/6FW5NunnMgkINzi1D3ji5yUCKwp1FHG9EQ==
  • Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=jisc.ac.uk;

> On 10 Feb 2022, at 15:02, mc36 <> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> On 2/10/22 14:06, Tim Chown wrote:
>>> But again, it is up to you to chose.
>> I d hope we can keep the required features light. Certainly no MPLS or
>> SR. But we d likely want stateless filtering for example.
>
> okkk, we'll set up a profile for that...
> what is the primary goal? the routing table size, or the acl entries?

We should probably define tests that match to the most likely deployment
scenarios?

Tim


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page