Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

rare-users - [RARE-users] [freertr] freeRouter rpms for CentOS and Fedora

Subject: RARE user and assistance email list

List archive

[RARE-users] [freertr] freeRouter rpms for CentOS and Fedora


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "mc36" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: [RARE-users] [freertr] freeRouter rpms for CentOS and Fedora
  • Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 07:32:00 +0100
  • List-id: <freertr.groups.io>
  • Mailing-list: list ; contact

documenting....


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: freeRouter rpms for CentOS and Fedora
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 06:20:28 +0100
From: mc36 <>
Reply-To:
To:

hi,

On 2/9/22 05:59, mc36 wrote:

Maybe vpp runs workers in some specific way, it can run on cores
listed in isolcpus=1-4 kernel.

to do that, 0 1 2 1 3 4 would do the trick...
but as your previous mail, maybe 0 1 1 1 2 2 ? :)

so i use the dpdk builtin from their examples to spwan the forwarding loop...
https://github.com/mc36/freeRouter/blob/c6c22bada52209759197736aaceed80ffe063878/misc/native/p4dpdk.h#L475
could you verify please if it pins itself to the isolcpus?

i personally don't do such because my vcpus easily forward
at 5gbps from an af_packet interface to my ixgbe,
(it's expensive because of the user-kernel switching)
and does the 10gbps between the two ports of the nic...
but it's native...
so my questions:
-you said kvm, but is it on a multi-socket server?
-is the qemu taskset on the host too, to the nic's socket?
-is the nic->socket on the same numa node on the host?
-is the ram->socket on the same numa node on the host?

thanks,
cs


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#151): https://groups.io/g/freertr/message/151
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/89016789/6413194
Group Owner:
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/freertr/unsub []
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page