Rare project developers

[mc36 <>]

hi,
thank you so much for the feedback!
br,
cs


On 2/23/23 01:09, Cristina Klippel Dominicini wrote:
> Hi Csaba,
>
> Very interesting question! I am not a specialist in cryptography, but your 
> question certainly provides food for thought.
>
> I am studying the finalists (https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/post-quantum-cryptography/selected-algorithms-2022 
> <https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/post-quantum-cryptography/selected-algorithms-2022>) and the openssh implementations (https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/openssh) to understand 
> the context. In the meanwhile, I also asked some questions to two friends who are cryptologists and should bring more assertive answers.
>
> I'll get back to you as soon as I have good insights on the matter :-)
>
> Best regards,
> Cristina
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *De:*  <> em nome 
> de mc36 <>
> *Enviado:* s  bado, 11 de fevereiro de 2023 04:44:51
> *Para:* Cristina Klippel Dominicini
> *Cc:* Ronald van der Pol; 
> *Assunto:* [rare-dev] what is your opinion about quantum resistant algorithms?
> hi cristina,
> so i recently had a conversation/monologue(?) on irc about the subject and as 
> you're my only trustworthy math/info prof i know of,
> hereby i would like to ask your opinion about the topic... all what i see is 
> that we had a lot of candidate algorithms at the
> nist competition but round by round they divided this number by two, and 
> there are still too many imho, and this challenge will
> end like what happened with the advanced encryption _standard_ (aes*). i'm 
> know that picking an algorithm could be n-p hard task,
> and i know about existing implementations of the algos in public git repos 
> and i strongly feel that we're in the hands of some
> of the top cleverest mathematicians/cryptographers here so no need to worry, 
> and i'm optimistic having the finalist in freerouter,
> but still, do you have a preference here or following openssh guys 'blindly' 
> and starting to have something compatible (?) to what
> they recently started and hoping that will be the good choice just to have 
> something?
> thanks,
> cs
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Esta mensagem (incluindo anexos) cont  m informa    o confidencial destinada a um usu  rio espec  fico e seu conte  do    protegido por lei. Se voc   n  o    o destinat  rio correto deve 
> apagar esta mensagem.
>
> O emitente desta mensagem    respons  vel por seu conte  do e endere  amento.
> Cabe ao destinat  rio cuidar quanto ao tratamento adequado. A divulga    o, reprodu    o e/ou distribui    o sem a devida autoriza    o ou qualquer outra a    o sem conformidade com as normas 
> internas do Ifes s  o proibidas e pass  veis de san    o disciplinar, c  vel e criminal.