Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

rare-dev - Re: [rare-dev] [freertr] [RARE-users] Routing between wireguard tunnels

Subject: Rare project developers

List archive

Re: [rare-dev] [freertr] [RARE-users] Routing between wireguard tunnels


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Gabriel Tetzner <>
  • To: mc36 <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [rare-dev] [freertr] [RARE-users] Routing between wireguard tunnels
  • Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 23:34:39 -0300

anybody?

Em sáb., 27 de ago. de 2022 às 12:26, mc36 <> escreveu:
come on guys please! it really seems not that hard if you know basic routing :)

On 8/27/22 16:56, Gabriel Tetzner wrote:
> Anybody?
>
> Em sex., 26 de ago. de 2022   s 17:18, Gabriel Tetzner via groups.io <http://groups.io> <gabrieltetznermenegueti16= <mailto:>> escreveu:
>
>     image.png
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I managed to solve it with Csaba's tip to isolate the vrf, I used the EIGRP protocol and configured the routing issue:
>
>     Now 20.0.0.3 ping 10.0.0.3 <http://10.0.0.3>:
>
>     freertr-3:
>     sh int tun1:
>
>     tunnel1 is up
>        description:
>        state changed 17 times, last at 2022-08-24 21:42:28, 2d0h ago
>        last packet input 00:00:02 ago, output 00:00:02 ago, drop never ago
>        type is wireguard, hwaddr=none, mtu=1400, bw=8000kbps, vrf=wireguard
>        ipv4 address=20.0.0.3/24 <http://20.0.0.3/24>, mask=255.255.255.0, ifcid=150335649
>        received 33024 packets (2180896 bytes) dropped 0 packets (0 bytes)
>        transmitted 1193 packets (74066 bytes) macsec=false sgt=false
>
>     freertr#ping 10.0.0.3 vrf wireguard
>     pinging 10.0.0.3, src="null," vrf=wireguard, cnt=5, len=64, df=false, tim=1000, gap=0, ttl=255, tos=0, sgt=0, flow=0, fill=0, alrt=-1, sweep=false, multi=false
>     !!!!!
>     result=100.0%, recv/sent/lost/err=5/5/0/0, took 726, min/avg/max/dev rtt=143/144/150/7.4, ttl 254/254/254/0.0, tos 0/0.0/0/0.0
>
>     The reverse is also possible:
>
>     freertr-r2:
>
>     freertr#sh int tun1
>     tunnel1 is up
>        description:
>        state changed 21 times, last at 2022-08-26 21:13:09, 00:55:27 ago
>        last packet input 00:00:03 ago, output 00:00:03 ago, drop never ago
>        type is wireguard, hwaddr=none, mtu=1400, bw=8000kbps, vrf=wireguard
>        ipv4 address=10.0.0.3/24 <http://10.0.0.3/24>, mask=255.255.255.0, ifcid=906822900
>        received 30063 packets (1989950 bytes) dropped 0 packets (0 bytes)
>        transmitted 1298 packets (80644 bytes) macsec=false sgt=false
>
>     freertr#ping 20.0.0.3 vrf wireguard
>     pinging 20.0.0.3, src="null," vrf=wireguard, cnt=5, len=64, df=false, tim=1000, gap=0, ttl=255, tos=0, sgt=0, flow=0, fill=0, alrt=-1, sweep=false, multi=false
>     !!!!!
>     result=100.0%, recv/sent/lost/err=5/5/0/0, took 717, min/avg/max/dev rtt=143/143/145/0.6, ttl 254/254/254/0.0, tos 0/0.0/0/0.0
>
>     Now I am left with a question, how do I make the debian machine in freeRtr-r3 ping the ip of the freeRtr-2 tunnel?
>
>     In this topology consider that there is a prometheus server running on top of freeRtr-r3 debian and I need to talk to 10.0.0.3?
>
>     Can anyone help me?
>
>     Thanks...
>
>
>     Em sex., 26 de ago. de 2022   s 04:03, Gabriel Tetzner via groups.io <http://groups.io> <gabrieltetznermenegueti16= <mailto:>> escreveu:
>
>         anybody?
>
>         Em qua., 24 de ago. de 2022   s 12:40, mc36 < <mailto:>> escreveu:
>
>             anybody?
>
>
>             On 8/18/22 18:09, Gabriel Tetzner wrote:
>              > Hi all,
>              >
>              > I have the following topology built using two wireguard tunnels:
>              >
>              > image.png
>              >
>              > In this case freertr-r3 is isolated on another network, but has a public ip to tunnel wireguard with freertr-r1 which is also on another network and has a public ip.
>              >
>              > This topology is working and the pings respectively for each ip:
>              >
>              > 10.0.0.2 ping 10.0.0.3
>              > 20.0.0.2 ping 20.0.0.3
>              > 10.0.0.3 ping 10.0.0.2
>              > 20.0.0.3 ping 20.0.0.2
>              >
>              > But I want 20.0.0.2 to reach 10.0.0.3, do I need to configure a route for this using ipv4 route? or is there another way to route the traffic? in this case I am
>             talking about
>              > freertr-r1.
>              >
>
>     _._,_._,_
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Groups.io Links:
>
>     You receive all messages sent to this group.
>
>     View/Reply Online (#629) <https://groups.io/g/freertr/message/629> | Reply To Group
>     <mailto:?subject=Re:%20Re%3A%20%5Bfreertr%5D%20%5BRARE-users%5D%20%5Brare-dev%5D%20Routing%20between%20wireguard%20tunnels> | Reply To Sender
>     <mailto:?subject=Private:%20Re:%20Re%3A%20%5Bfreertr%5D%20%5BRARE-users%5D%20%5Brare-dev%5D%20Routing%20between%20wireguard%20tunnels> | Mute
>     This Topic <https://groups.io/mt/93229359/7122407> | New Topic <https://groups.io/g/freertr/post>
>     Your Subscription <https://groups.io/g/freertr/editsub/7122407> | Contact Group Owner <mailto:> | Unsubscribe <https://groups.io/g/freertr/unsub>
>     [ <mailto:>]
>
>     _._,_._,_
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page