Rare project developers

[Frédéric LOUI <>]

> Yes. I hope they do it by publishing the BSP source as they did before
> and not some kind of binary distribution which would complicate things
> for me.

I’m looking at APS portal and it seems that the BSP will now be an entire tarball

(No need to merge now with INTEL reference BSP)

You can find it here: (need authentication)

https://aps-networks.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portal/3/article/1211760641

I have an account on behalf of the RARE project, mc36 also have it if you need, we can download files for you.

Or simply request an account mentioning that you are working on RARE projet.

Le 2 juin 2022 à 13:18, Alexander Gall <> a écrit :

On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 12:57:58 +0200, mc36 <> said:

hi,
On 6/2/22 12:16, Alexander Gall wrote:

On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 12:07:52 +0200, mc36 <> said:

hi,
taking a closer look on what's going on, i just realized that this pre_emit stuff is basically just before the very core tocpu check:
https://github.com/rare-freertr/freeRtr/blob/7a417d4537db9cbae8fdcb9f618ef008f62f3913/misc/p4bf/include/ig_ctl.p4#L187
so for now, i strongly believe that we can get rid of all the ternary matches here if we split the table... the cpuhdr
insertion could go directly to the inner part of the if, and the rest could go to the else part... for the bridging ternary,
i can easily list all the possible values for the sap_en/de_cap so this table could easily become an all-exact.... let's see.... :)

Ok, great. 

unfortunately not, it broke multicast at all...
well yeahh, so the cpu header is not needed in that case...
but nevermind, i'll find out something.... one of the two
ternary will go away...

In the meantime I found that 9.7.2 fixes the compiler bug
in 9.7.1 that shows up with the BNG profile. I'll move RARE to 9.7.2
and tigether with your changes we should have a complete RARE on
Tofino2 :)

BTW, I think we now need an additional optimizer run for Tofino2.

indeed....

but before doing so, lemme ask the aps guys if they progressed porting the 2556 bsp to sde990...
if that's the case, we could completely move to sde990?

Yes. I hope they do it by publishing the BSP source as they did before
and not some kind of binary distribution which would complicate things
for me.

-- 
Alex