Rare project developers

[mc36 <>]

On 3/27/21 10:20 AM, Frédéric LOUI wrote:

> > any other idea what else should we address taking the feature matrix ( 
> > https://wiki.geant.org/display/RARE/Home ) into consideration ?
> It is not a new feature per say, but I like junos object autocompletion, and 
> I think it can be convenient improvement.
>
> Please let me know your thoughts


here i wanted if one checks the features and packs some of them into a 
profile and gives it a name....

but explicitly answering your request, currently, all the help texts are 
written in freertr in the following way:

http://src.mchome.nop.hu/src/ip/ipFwdIface.java
"
        l.add("2 .     dapp-disable                disable dapp processing");
        l.add("2 3     verify-source               enable per packet 
validation");
        l.add("3 .       any                       source is reachable via any 
interface");
        l.add("3 .       rx                        source is reachable via this 
interface");
        l.add("3 .       none                      disable per packet source 
checking");
        l.add("2 .     gateway-local               install local route");
        l.add("2 .     gateway-remote              install remote route");
        l.add("2 3     gateway-prefix              prefix list to install throught 
gateway");
        l.add("3 .       <name>                    name of prefix list");
        l.add("2 3     gateway-routemap            route map to set throught 
gateway");
        l.add("3 .       <name>                    name of route map");
        l.add("2 3     access-group-in             access list to apply to ingress 
packets");
        l.add("3 .       <name>                    name of access list");
        l.add("2 3     access-group-out            access list to apply to egress 
packets");
        l.add("3 .       <name>                    name of access list");
        l.add("2 3     access-group-common-in      common access list to apply to 
ingress packets");
        l.add("3 .       <name>                    name of access list");
        l.add("2 3     access-group-common-out     common access list to apply to 
egress packets");
        l.add("3 .       <name>                    name of access list");
"

these are converted to the actual parser's needs, then later, enforced by the 
cli handlers...
thats how we have netconf, restconf, cisco and junos like cli with less than 
100 lines each....

as you can spot here, the <name> is the issue, it looks good when you hit ? 
but obviously useless...

my idea (which is already in the http://sources.nop.hu/todo.txt ) is that i 
add the infra to
handle <.acl.name>, and one interm/summer of code/whatever goes though the 
almost 10000 occurences
and adds the prefix depending if it's an acl, prefix-list, route-map, 
route-policy, whatever
that can have a name....
the one cannot exist without the other and vica versa, that's why it's 
pending for long time....

regards,
cs