edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive

Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN Validator: a missing check?

From: Ian Young <ian AT iay.org.uk>
To: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter AT restena.lu>
Cc: edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org
Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN Validator: a missing check?
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:59:40 +0100
Feedback-id: 217.155.173.110

On 22 Jul 2024, at 08:57, Stefan Winter (via edugain-discuss Mailing List) <edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org> wrote:

'https//www.uni.l/en/' is not a valid RFC3986 compliant URI

I could be wrong but I think you'll find that it is, in fact, valid. It's not an absolute, but a relative, value, same as "this" would be.

This is one of the (many) reasons that schema-validity isn't sufficient for SAML metadata.

-- Ian

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN Validator: a missing check?, Stefan Winter, 22-Jul-2024
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] eduGAIN Validator: a missing check?, Ian Young, 07/22/2024