Skip to Content.

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] [refeds] mari plan & next steps

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive


Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] [refeds] mari plan & next steps


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Leif Johansson <leifj AT sunet.se>
  • To: Lukas Hämmerle <lukas.haemmerle AT switch.ch>, edugain-discuss AT geant.net, refeds AT terena.org
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] [refeds] mari plan & next steps
  • Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:12:49 +0100
  • List-archive: <https://mail.geant.net/mailman/private/edugain-discuss/>
  • List-id: eduGAIN discussion list <edugain-discuss.geant.net>

On 2014-10-29 17:00, Lukas Hämmerle wrote:
> On 29.10.14 16:16, Andy Bennett wrote:
>> Some federations insist on releasing all the requested attributes and
>> if you request one they're not happy with then they release nothing.
>
> I wonder how many federations are in this category... Any numbers?
> Wouldn't it be easier to kindly ask them to change their behaviour
> instead of investing a lot of time in
> specification/implementation/deployment of a new meta attribute that is
> only mitigating and not solving the problem really (see below)?

Thats the wrong question to ask.

The right question is this: how many services will have this problem?

The answer is probably (today) the size of the edugain SP list plus the
top non-interfederated services in MET.

Cheers Leif






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page