Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] [eduGAIN-SG] issue on metadata flow

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive

Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] [eduGAIN-SG] issue on metadata flow


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ian Young <ian AT iay.org.uk>
  • To: Nicole Harris <harris AT terena.org>
  • Cc: idem-staff AT garr.it, edugain-tsg AT geant.net, edugain-discuss AT geant.net, marco Malavolti <marco.malavolti AT garr.it>
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] [eduGAIN-SG] issue on metadata flow
  • Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:30:06 +0100
  • List-archive: <https://mail.geant.net/mailman/private/edugain-discuss/>
  • List-id: eduGAIN discussion list <edugain-discuss.geant.net>


On 7 Jul 2014, at 11:06, Nicole Harris <harris AT terena.org> wrote:

> Supporting SPs "quitting" federations when they can get everything from
> one place is going to be an interesting task.

I agree. The critical point comes when all of the client IdPs the SP is
interested in from a given eduGAIN participant federation become available
through eduGAIN. That's when that SP can simplify their lives by *not* having
to register with that federation. Ultimately, of course, you'd hope that each
SP would only need to register once (for purposes of metadata exchange, let's
skip over the contractual issues for now).

For the larger SPs, this may be a hard place to get to as it will require
that essentially all of the IdPs registered in the target federation become
available to them through eduGAIN. Even a few which are not will be enough
for the SP to feel that they need to register everywhere. As a result, it's
hard for me to imagine an opt-in policy for IdPs ever leading to the state we
want.

-- Ian



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page