Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] ALL eduGAIN entities in UK federation?

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive

Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] ALL eduGAIN entities in UK federation?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Peter Schober <peter.schober AT univie.ac.at>
  • To: edugain-discuss AT geant.net
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] ALL eduGAIN entities in UK federation?
  • Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:38:30 +0100
  • Authentication-results: prod-mail.geant.net (amavisd-new); dkim=pass header.i= AT univie.ac.at
  • List-archive: <https://mail.geant.net/mailman/private/edugain-discuss/>
  • List-id: eduGAIN discussion list <edugain-discuss.geant.net>
  • Organization: ACOnet

* Peter Schober <peter.schober AT univie.ac.at> [2014-02-05 16:17]:
> Now ACOnet also doesn't intend to provide centralized fine-grained
> mix-and-match metadata feeds or discovery services, but we do provide
> several instances of a central ("fallback" as we call it) SAMLDS,
> notably one including, and one not including, interfederation IDPs.

I'm aware that this fails the "nothing should change at the entity"
principle, though, which seems to have motivated the inclusion of
interfederation entities in the existing UKf downstream feed in the
first place.
And whether or not such a principle causes more work/trouble than it's
worth (which it would be in our case) likely is a function of the
number of entities in your federation.
-peter





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page