RARE user and assistance email list

["Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <>]

Hi CS,

I plan to bring a laptop that runs virtualized routers and connects to other 
physical gear on site - no tunnels that way.

But since you're doing it remotely, I thought we'd have to set up tunnels to 
you. But is that feasible? If not, how are we going to test?

Jeffrey


Juniper Business Use Only
-----Original Message-----
From: mc36 <>
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 10:51 AM
To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <>; Antoni Przygienda 
<>; 
Cc: Krzysztof Szarkowicz <>; ; 

Subject: Re: BIER interop in Prague

[External Email. Be cautious of content]


+chaining back the lists, email body srinked!!!!


yesss thanks, i had to raise a ticket at support@ietf... it neeeeeds 
tiiiiiiiime... :)))))))

tunnels; whoaaa so you also can support an interop remotely?!?!? thanks!!!!

security... in telco.... no fvkkin way, what about a gre between 2 public 
ips???

(ietf normally have a purpose kept /24 /64 and im on public ip pppoe plan on 
my flat:))))

on this we equally can set up our virtuals to carry the igp and mpls, then we 
equally can xconnect a "physical" plug-port, remotely.......

(once u have the ietf ip i can send you a vmdk or just the rtr-sw.txt and 
rtr-hw.txt and you can javac the code from github....)




alternatively, gretap, its gre plus ethertype... i can send you a 
preconfigured rtr-sw.txt rtr-hw.txt after you provides me a public ietf ip....

its gre plus briding ethertype... much like how ppp(oe) used to carry 
ethernet frames but here this happens over gre...

if not gretap, then it can be a static etherip (rfc) or static srv6's layer2 
protocol, alternatively same dataplane but multihop bgp / evpn

any of these holds the preconfigured "plugport" javac-java -able config from 
my side....


if none of these then let me hear your your preferences?!??!?

thanks,

cs



On 10/2/23 16:29, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang wrote:
> Hi CS,
>
> OK you're attending remotely but registered as "on-site"
>
> So I suppose we need to set up tunnels between onsite VMs/gears and your 
> gear? I thought you once mentioned you could not do that due to all kinds 
> of security concerns.
>
> Jeffrey
>