RARE user and assistance email list

[mc36 <>]

you dont need ipv6 at all in your core to provide ipv6 services over mpls

vpnv6 is about that for customers, labelled unicast is about to provide raw ip

moreover, if isis would capable to bring up bgp then you can even run ipv4 
services without ipv4 in your core

br,
cs



On 3/14/23 15:59, Maria Del Carmen Misa Moreira wrote:
> Hi Csaba,
>
> Yes, I   m currently taking a look to the topology that you mentioned and the 
> BGP CTP.
> However, I tried to build the simulation with VPNV4 and VPNV6 but BGP is only 
> up for IPv4 and IPv6 if it   s directly connected.
>
> R1#show ipv6 bgp 10 summary
> neighbor                   as       ready   learn   sent   uptime
> fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2   20965   false   0         0       never
> fd01:30::2                293      true    2         2       00:42:22
> fd01:30::3                20965   false   0         0       never
>
> The first problem is that I cannot ping to fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2 from R1 and it 
> is directly connected but OSPF shows an init state and not a full state.
> R1#show ipv6 ospf 10 neighbor
> interface   area   address                     routerid    state   uptime
> ethernet1   0       fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2   10.4.30.4   init    00:53:05
> ethernet2   0       fd00:51e5::a:1:14:2   10.2.30.2   full    00:53:05
>
> For BGP I have two processes configured with vpnuni for IPv4 and ovpnuni for 
> IPv6
>
> router bgp4 10
>    description [IPv4 iBGP/eBGP FOR R1 VLAN 10]
>    vrf VRF_DEFAULT
>    local-as 293
>    router-id 10.1.30.1
>    no safe-ebgp
>    address-family vpnuni
>    neighbor 10.2.30.2 remote-as 293
>    neighbor 10.2.30.2 description [VLAN ID = 30] [R1@ETH2] -> [R2@ETH3]
>    neighbor 10.2.30.2 local-as 293
>    neighbor 10.2.30.2 address-family vpnuni
>    neighbor 10.2.30.2 distance 200
>    neighbor 10.2.30.2 additional-path-rx vpnuni
>    neighbor 10.2.30.2 additional-path-tx vpnuni
>    neighbor 10.2.30.2 update-source loopback30
>    neighbor 10.2.30.2 send-community both
>    neighbor 10.3.30.3 remote-as 20965
>    neighbor 10.3.30.3 description [VLAN ID = 30] [R1] -> [R2/R4] -> [R3]
>    neighbor 10.3.30.3 local-as 293
>    neighbor 10.3.30.3 address-family vpnuni
>    neighbor 10.3.30.3 distance 20
>    neighbor 10.3.30.3 additional-path-rx vpnuni
>    neighbor 10.3.30.3 additional-path-tx vpnuni
>    neighbor 10.3.30.3 update-source loopback30
>    neighbor 10.3.30.3 send-community both
>    neighbor 10.1.12.2 remote-as 20965
>    neighbor 10.1.12.2 description [VLAN ID = 30] [R1@ETH1] -> [R4@ETH1]
>    neighbor 10.1.12.2 local-as 293
>    neighbor 10.1.12.2 address-family vpnuni
>    neighbor 10.1.12.2 distance 20
>    neighbor 10.1.12.2 additional-path-rx vpnuni
>    neighbor 10.1.12.2 additional-path-tx vpnuni
>    neighbor 10.1.12.2 update-source ethernet1
>    neighbor 10.1.12.2 send-community both
>    readvertise 10.1.30.1/32
>    ecmp
>    afi-vrf VRF_CMS enable
>    afi-vrf VRF_CMS redistribute connected
>    afi-vrf VRF_ATLAS enable
>    afi-vrf VRF_ATLAS redistribute connected
>    exit
> !
> router bgp6 10
>    description [IPv6 iBGP FOR R1 VLAN 10]
>    vrf VRF_DEFAULT
>    local-as 293
>    router-id 10.1.30.1
>    no safe-ebgp
>    address-family ovpnuni
>    neighbor fd01:30::2 remote-as 293
>    neighbor fd01:30::2 description [VLAN ID = 30] [R1@ETH2] -> [R2@ETH3]
>    neighbor fd01:30::2 local-as 293
>    neighbor fd01:30::2 address-family ovpnuni
>    neighbor fd01:30::2 distance 200
>    neighbor fd01:30::2 additional-path-rx ovpnuni
>    neighbor fd01:30::2 additional-path-tx ovpnuni
>    neighbor fd01:30::2 update-source loopback30
>    neighbor fd01:30::2 send-community both
>    neighbor fd01:30::3 remote-as 20965
>    neighbor fd01:30::3 description [VLAN ID = 30] [R1] -> [R2/R4] -> [R3]
>    neighbor fd01:30::3 local-as 293
>    neighbor fd01:30::3 address-family ovpnuni
>    neighbor fd01:30::3 distance 20
>    neighbor fd01:30::3 additional-path-rx ovpnuni
>    neighbor fd01:30::3 additional-path-tx ovpnuni
>    neighbor fd01:30::3 update-source loopback30
>    neighbor fd01:30::3 send-community both
>    neighbor fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2 remote-as 20965
>    neighbor fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2 description [VLAN ID = 30] [R1@ETH1] -> 
> [R4@ETH1]
>    neighbor fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2 local-as 293
>    neighbor fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2 address-family ovpnuni
>    neighbor fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2 distance 20
>    neighbor fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2 additional-path-rx ovpnuni
>    neighbor fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2 additional-path-tx ovpnuni
>    neighbor fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2 update-source ethernet1
>    neighbor fd00:51e5::a:1:12:2 send-community both
>    readvertise fd01:30::1/128
>    ecmp
>    afi-ovrf VRF_CMS enable
>    afi-ovrf VRF_CMS redistribute connected
>    afi-ovrf VRF_ATLAS enable
>    afi-ovrf VRF_ATLAS redistribute connected
>    exit
>
> Any idea or suggestion?
>
> Best regards,
> Carmen Misa
>
>
> > On 11 Mar 2023, at 09:57, mc36 via groups.io <http://groups.io> < 
> > <>> wrote:
> >
> > also you really should take a look on the topologies i've sent for the 
> > juniper guys about the colorful labeled unicast.... :)
> >
> > "
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [rare-dev] BGP CT interop - Colorful Resolution
> > Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 08:02:39 +0100
> > From: mc36 < <>>
> > To: <>, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai < <>>, Natrajan Venkataraman < 
> > <>>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz < <>>, Anton Elita < <>>
> > CC: Reshma Das < <>>
> > "
> >
> > is the tread, just "star it" in your mailer then try the new topologies 
> > that'll arrive soon.... :)
> >
> > also dig into your mailing and try the previous topologies (3 were there already) also, 
> > one of them was a "red-blue vpns over rsvp-te"
> >
> > br,
> > cs
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/11/23 08:15, mc36 wrote:
> > > hihi
> > > could someone please take a look on carmen's topology?
> > > thx,
> > > cs
> > > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > > Subject:     Re:http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 
> > > <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4>
> > > Date:     Fri, 10 Mar 2023 20:06:55 +0000
> > > From:     Maria Del Carmen Misa Moreira < 
> > > <>>
> > > To:     mc36 < <>>
> > > Thanks Csaba! I have a simulation that is more or less working... I have the routes for R1, R3 and R4 but not for R2 I don't know why because I have the same. Anyway, it was 
> > > enough for today Enjoy your weekend
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > *From:* mc36 < <>>
> > > *Sent:* 10 March 2023 18:44
> > > *To:* Maria Del Carmen Misa Moreira < 
> > > <>>
> > > *Subject:* Re: http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 
> > > <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4>
> > > well the less the more sometimes....
> > > 3 ospf processes for 1 bgp per topology seeems a bit overkill...
> > > you need 1 ospf and 1 bgp per router and it'll be dual stack all         the 
> > > way per tology
> > > have you seeen frederic's validated design? almost the same but with rsvp-te 
> > > to have
> > > "traffic engineering" capabilities offloaded to hardware....
> > > On 3/10/23 14:34, Maria Del Carmen Misa Moreira wrote:
> > > > I'm building a simulation. I need 3 OSPF and 3 BGP processes for each VRF, 
> > > > right?
> > > > I remove them and I got this warning:
> > > >
> > > > info cfgInit.executeSWcommands:cfgInit.java:768 line 105: "neighbor fd01:10::1 
> > > > update-source loopback10" : % in other vrf
> > > >
> > > > Because fd01:10::1         if the loopback of the neighbor that belongs to 
> > > > VRF_ATLAS.
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > *From:* mc36 < <>>
> > > > *Sent:* 10 March 2023 09:56
> > > > *To:* Maria Del Carmen Misa Moreira < 
> > > > <>>
> > > > *Subject:* Re:http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4><http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 
> > > > <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4>>
> > > > vc time
> > > >
> > > > On 3/10/23 09:55, mc36 wrote:
> > > > > with some crazy cheats (implicit null between the adjacent nodes, penultimate 
> > > > > hop popping, ...)
> > > > >
> > > > > it's just the service label (4 bytes) which selects the egress interface & 
> > > > > nexthop & ethertype
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/10/23 09:53, mc36 wrote:
> > > > > > and comparative in mtu:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > vlans = 4 bytes
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mpls = 2*4 bytes: the outer target node label, and the inner service label
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 3/10/23 09:52, mc36 wrote:
> > > > > > > it's just that you dont have to build parallel infrastructure with 3 parallel 
> > > > > > > ospfs and bgps,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > but a single core
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > an mp-bgp in vpnv4/vpnv6 over loopbacks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and vrfs with route-target export-imports
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and kaboom, you have 3 parallel topologies and you can concentrate on pbr if 
> > > > > > > mpls-vpn-extranet is not better...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 3/10/23 09:49, Maria Del Carmen Misa Moreira wrote:
> > > > > > > > I think so... you enable it in that profile, maybe you can check but it 
> > > > > > > > should have both features enabled.
> > > > > > > > I have never worked with this MPLS Layer3 VPN, maybe I should take a look
> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > *From:* mc36 < <>>
> > > > > > > > *Sent:* 10 March 2023 09:47
> > > > > > > > *To:* Maria Del Carmen Misa Moreira < 
> > > > > > > > <>>
> > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re:http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4><http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 
> > > > > > > > <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4>> <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 
> > > > > > > > <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4><http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4>>>
> > > > > > > > btw why the vlan subinterfaces and not mpls layer3 vpn?
> > > >                     >>>>
> > > > > > > > https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html 
> > > > > > > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html>
> > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html 
> > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html>>
> > > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html 
> > > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html>
> > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html 
> > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html>>>
> > > > > > > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html 
> > > > > > > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html>
> > > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html 
> > > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html>
> > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html 
> > > <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l3_vpns/configuration/xe-16/mp-l3-vpns-xe-16-book.html>>>>
> > > > > > > > On 3/10/23 09:46, mc36 wrote:
> > > > > > > > > normally bridge-filter (acl to count) could be run in paralell with pbr...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > these are disjoint controls so i dont think they cannot coexist:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4 
> > > > > > > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4>
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4 
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4>>
> > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4 
> > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4>
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4 
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4>>>
> > > > > > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4 
> > > > > > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4>
> > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4 
> > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4>
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4 
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_pbr.p4>>>>
> > > > > > > > > https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4 
> > > > > > > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4>
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4 
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4>>
> > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4 
> > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4>
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4 
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4>>>
> > > > > > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4 
> > > > > > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4>
> > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4 
> > > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4>
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4 
> > > <https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/p4src/include/ig_ctl_acl_in.p4>>>>
> > > > > > > > > are you sure that profile have both enabled?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 3/10/23 09:40, Maria Del Carmen Misa Moreira wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Badddd.
> > > > > > > > > > I'm able to do PBR or BRIDGE-FILTER but not both at the same time even with the profile CERN_FLOW that you created the last time for us. Then, in some links we only have 
> > > > > > > > > > 1 VLAN
> > > > > > > > > > to use and I would like 3 VRFs (for example AMS -> CHI because they use 
> > > > > > > > > > sense-o) so my supervisor mentioned that there is one technique call QinQ to 
> > > > > > > > > > encapsulate VLANs.
> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > *From:* mc36 < <>>
> > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* 10 March 2023 09:37
> > > > > > > > > > *To:* Maria Del Carmen Misa Moreira < 
> > > > > > > > > > <>>
> > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re:http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4><http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 
> > > > > > > > > > <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4>> <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 
> > > > > > > > > > <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4><http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4>>>
> > > <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4><http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 
> > > <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4><http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4 <http://temp.nop.hu/VID_20230309_185727.mp4>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > someone mentioned p4 stuff? how is your experiment is going?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 3/10/23 09:14, Maria Del Carmen Misa Moreira wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > This song always gives motivation to do P4 stuff
> >
> >
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > Groups.io <http://groups.io/>Links: You receive all messages sent to this 
> > group.
> > View/Reply Online (#1149):https://groups.io/g/freertr/message/1149 
> > <https://groups.io/g/freertr/message/1149>
> > Mute This Topic:https://groups.io/mt/97537895/7436820 
> > <https://groups.io/mt/97537895/7436820>
> > Group Owner: <>
> > Unsubscribe:https://groups.io/g/freertr/unsub 
> > <https://groups.io/g/freertr/unsub>[ 
> > <>]
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-