Subject: RARE user and assistance email list
List archive
- From: mc36 <>
- To: Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>, "" <>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <>, Simon Leinen <>, Ivana Golub <>, Frédéric LOUI <>
- Cc: Natrajan Venkataraman <>, Reshma Das <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:59:58 +0100
well i need to test this as a whole, i have question marks.... i'll keep you
posted....
On 2/15/23 07:57, mc36 wrote:
but well, the rsvp-te tunnel creation will be manual like in ciscos, so on r5
you'll have to do something like
interface tunnel1
tunnel destination r5
tunnel mode rsvp-te
vrf forwarding red
interface tunnel2
tunnel destination r6
tunnel mode rsvp-te
vrf forwarding blue
interface toward-r6
vrf forwarding red
interface toward-r7
vrf forwarding blue
router bgp 123
afi-color red redistribute connected
afi-color blue redistribute connected
neighbor address-of-r4 address-family ctp
On 2/15/23 07:49, mc36 wrote:
hi,
let's have a different topology to answer your question:
r1 r6 <----- red row
> r3---r4---r5 <
r2 r7 <----- blue row
r1 and r2 are cpes in vpnv4/vpnv6 vrfs of r3,
r3-r4 will have two rsvp-te tunels and vpnv4/vpnv6 ibgp,
r4-r5 will have a single bgp-ct
and r6 and r7 are cpes in vpnv4/vpnv6 vrfs of v5
so this doable, but i don't have a complete test case for it, just in pieces,
but i can quickly write you this topology as a test if that helps?
br,
cs
On 2/15/23 07:42, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai wrote:
rare/freertr used the neighbor 1.1.1.1 address-family knob whta controls, but
the safis are similarly exclusive, only one of them is accepted:
Yea, we noticed that during last hackathon. that s ok, we can work with
that.
But my main question was this:
Lets say there are two RSVP-TE-Tunnels (red, blue) between r1 to r2.
red red---r5
r0-->r1====r2<--r4
blue blue
so in the above topology we can separate the two colors while using a single
link in between r1 and r2 with 1 bgp-ct session...
Can red bgp-ct routes put traffic on red-Tunnel. And blue-routes put traffic
on blue-Tunnel?
i.e. based on the mapping-community on the bgp-route, resolve bgp nexthop r2
over a red/blue-Tunnel.
I thought that is the Colorful resolution functionality that
arrived in spring. Sorry if I misunderstood. :)
Thanks
Kaliraj
*From: *mc36 <>
*Date: *Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 10:11 PM
*To: *Kaliraj Vairavakkalai <>, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <>, Simon Leinen <>, Ivana Golub <>, Fr d ric LOUI <>
*Cc: *Natrajan Venkataraman <>, Reshma Das <>,
<>
*Subject: *Re: [freertr] [RARE-users] EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
(xr lifted this recently, whereas it's still true for xe and rare/freerouter)
c8000v-1(config)#router bgp 1
c8000v-1(config-router)#address-family ipv4 unicast
c8000v-1(config-router-af)#neighbor 1.1.1.1 send-label ?
explicit-null Advertise Explicit Null label in place of
Implicit Null
<cr> <cr>
c80000v-1(config-router-af)#neighbor 1.1.1.1 send-label
so this knob is what "converts" this peering from ipv4 unicast to ipv4
labeled unicast, and obviously it's set or not... :)
rare/freertr used the neighbor 1.1.1.1 address-family knob whta controls, but
the safis are similarly exclusive, only one of them is accepted:
sid#configure
sid(cfg)#router bgp4 123 vrf v3
sid(cfg-rtr)#neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 321
sid(cfg-rtr)#neighbor 1.1.1.1 address-family unicast labeled
sid(cfg-rtr)#show running-config this
router bgp4 123 vrf v3
neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 321
neighbor 1.1.1.1 address-family labeled
exit
!
sid(cfg-rtr)#
Juniper Business Use Only
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1071): https://groups.io/g/freertr/message/1071
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/96978256/6006518
Group Owner:
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/freertr/unsub []
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, (continued)
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, mc36, 02/15/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai, 02/15/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, mc36, 02/15/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai, 02/15/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] test topology for -ct interop ---- ex: EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, mc36, 02/15/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] test topology for -ct interop ---- ex: EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, Krzysztof Szarkowicz, 02/15/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] test topology for -ct interop ---- ex: EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, mc36, 02/15/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] test topology for -ct interop ---- ex: EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, mc36, 02/15/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] test topology for -ct interop ---- ex: EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, Krzysztof Szarkowicz, 02/16/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, mc36, 02/15/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, mc36, 02/15/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai, 02/15/2023
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] EANTC - BGP CT - Juniper-FreeRTR, mc36, 02/15/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.