Subject: RARE user and assistance email list
List archive
- From: Tim Chown <>
- To: "" <>
- Cc: "" <>, Frédéric LOUI () <>, Xavier Jeannin <>, Carmen Misa Moreira <>
- Subject: Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:40:22 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jisc.ac.uk; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=jisc.ac.uk; dkim=pass header.d=jisc.ac.uk; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=eAs5/p1QxbwQiPWJau0ZYiLJEK6h6kwpm4O/DUZUrXw=; b=WjsIBNqYK3ADKBrXoEUcXn4e6OPOGI7hm6ZXAzyy26lvwa7wb4E5tBBfyFvvoBE6r/uAV8AMd+9nH6xHONmlQkjQEwp7KiUc4QN51gys+5oKQNZJ0qSFf1RqK/QC4wxGpjERw68S33jpVJvLGEDwB/rK4S6Knx7U5xEZawfcqFl+1N3zBkE021nao3lRLV4tpsItrNpaOZTHeDqJUU7RrqaYQlWfZo+iW6HfgZopJbWgaEZ50I+daKKKTrilhkzwiSkVkFWvGEbJquWno1dzamzfijKu/WvS6Z+kSsXXkC9kgIXB2jVVRO9yT4zomNMkIXptsaUPU7+DEWnPmE59Ug==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jGjJ7ycN7kR25HU8NCsUn6BH/c0xh3AGQQy/l7GrL4PQ74y+kKZ8EimyKDWHC4ORVk6/ohYpC3SGQdHLgi0B3qok+abH//AhByAMhepDq4TIXwI1Qq+T6+lRS2Ecbr6rppHuqx/+/uF9VBgDfWLpqWDpGtu+NVf4g693kluv3X6Rc7CKoYsP1eteiiud8GTP6Rikuuq1yFTZcRyXP+KzG28jT32qrKFSv9bGvbPkBTR4adlFPpgQ4eZeJwFdiecjVRBiMaZO69bxni6Qo8bcsZaQaVB58ry+1ODdqiqZ54GkVp6dfhH7X2WlJGch2VJaJyMFHJNBg34prppK5d06fA==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=jisc.ac.uk;
Hi,
Here’s a deck from March 2022 about the components used in TimeMap, slide 8 I
think is most useful:
https://events.geant.org/event/1084/contributions/1022/attachments/672/942/Timemap_Anomaly_Detection_2ndPMW_2022_FFv1.pdf
Calculation of jitter can be a subtle, nuanced thing.
Tim
> On 23 Aug 2022, at 15:33, mc36 <> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/23/22 16:23, mc36 wrote:
>> On 8/23/22 16:18, mc36 wrote:
>>> well, doable, and it's a separate class if i recall correctly, that is,
>>> readily reuseable,
>>> and really not too time comsuming O(n), and i already do so for the ping
>>> because at that point,
>>> it's useful to have at hand, but heyy, once you have the stream, why
>>> would one do so???
>> lemme reverb this real quick...
>> so that it's a separate class in freerouter, that is reuseable, but,
>> since it's a calculated value from a series of data,
>
> so let's say we're already exporting the rtt as time series data,
> then to have the deviation from the series is just a matter of
> calculation...
> you can do it on the router surely, but if you do it elsewhere then you
> must be able to select a time range to calculate the deviation from just
> those...
>
> the thing is that, it could be a completely different value:
>
> please take a look at the below two pings... i tried to start them at the
> same time...
> they calculate the deviation obviously the same way, the difference is the
> time interval,
> 1111 pings: min/avg/max/dev rtt=3/4.0/19/1.0
> 2222 pings: min/avg/max/dev rtt=3/4.0/19/1.2
>
> probably, i had some more bigger responses when it ran twice the time and
> that's why the mean deviation 1.0 vs 1.2 mean deviation...
>
> br,
> cs
>
>
>
>
> noti#ping www.niif.hu repeat 1111
> info userReader.cmdEnter:userReader.java:1087 command noti#ping www.niif.hu
> repeat 1111 from local:telnet <loop> 23 -> 127.0.0.1 58682
> 2022-08-23 16:31:17
> resolving www.niif.hu for ipv6 ok!
> pinging 2001:738:0:420::b, src=2001:db8:1101::11, vrf=inet, cnt=1111,
> len=64, df=false, tim=1000, gap=0, ttl=255, tos=0, sgt=0, flow=0, fill=0,
> alrt=-1, sweep=false, multi=false
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!info
> userReader.cmdEnter:userReader.java:1087 command noti#ping www.niif.hu
> repeat 2222 from local:telnet <loop> 23 -> 127.0.0.1 35006
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> result=100.0%, recv/sent/lost/err=1111/1111/0/0, took 4603, min/avg/max/dev
> rtt=3/4.0/19/1.0, ttl 51/51.0/51/0.0, tos 0/0.0/0/0.0
> noti#
>
>
> noti#ping www.niif.hu repeat 2222
> info userReader.cmdEnter:userReader.java:1087 command noti#ping www.niif.hu
> repeat 2222 from local:telnet <loop> 23 -> 127.0.0.1 35006
> 2022-08-23 16:31:17
> resolving www.niif.hu for ipv6 ok!
> pinging 2001:738:0:420::b, src=2001:db8:1101::11, vrf=inet, cnt=2222,
> len=64, df=false, tim=1000, gap=0, ttl=255, tos=0, sgt=0, flow=0, fill=0,
> alrt=-1, sweep=false, multi=false
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> result=100.0%, recv/sent/lost/err=2222/2222/0/0, took 9184, min/avg/max/dev
> rtt=3/4.0/19/1.2, ttl 51/51.0/51/0.0, tos 0/0.0/0/0.0
> noti#
>
- Re: [RARE-users] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, (continued)
- Re: [RARE-users] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, Tim Chown, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, Tim Chown, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, Tim Chown, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, Tim Chown, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, Frédéric LOUI, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, Tim Chown, 08/24/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, Tim Chown, 08/23/2022
- Message not available
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] [freertr] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] TWAMP on FreeRtr?, mc36, 08/23/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.