Subject: RARE user and assistance email list
List archive
- From: mc36 <>
- To: "" <>
- Cc: Frédéric LOUI <>
- Subject: [RARE-users] Fwd: Loopback interface
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 18:29:36 +0200
resending because xavier seemingly wont answer for a while...
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Loopback interface
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 18:28:08 +0200
From: mc36 <>
To: Everson Borges <>, Xavier Jeannin
<>
hi,
so when you ping from poznan then the box picked up the outgoing interface as
source, which is unlabelled...
POZ0001#ping 10.1.1.1 vrf CORE
pinging 10.1.1.1, src=null, vrf=CORE, cnt=5, len=64, df=false, tim=1000,
gap=0, ttl=255, tos=0, sgt=0, flow=0, fill=0, alrt=-1, sweep=false,
multi=false
!!!!!
result=100.0%, recv/sent/lost/err=5/5/0/0, took 115, min/avg/max/dev
rtt=23/23.0/23/0.0, ttl 255/255/255/0.0, tos 0/0.0/0/0.0
as long as you select the loopback, it's clear that it does not work in this
way either...
POZ0001#ping 10.1.1.1 vrf CORE source loopback0
pinging 10.1.1.1, src=10.4.4.4, vrf=CORE, cnt=5, len=64, df=false, tim=1000,
gap=0, ttl=255, tos=0, sgt=0, flow=0, fill=0, alrt=-1, sweep=false,
multi=false
.....
result=0.0%, recv/sent/lost/err=0/5/5/0, took 5002, min/avg/max/dev
rtt=10000/0.0/0/0.0, ttl 256/0.0/0/0.0, tos 256/0.0/0/0.0
POZ0001#
after ping flooding, i found that the packets are arriving so then the
dataplane dropped them...
at that point i started remembering a recent question series so i quickly
found the culprit:
POZ0001#show startup-config | include tna
hostname POZ0001
alias exec tna-set-profile sticky-param RENATER_PEERING_L2
POZ0001#
xavier, how are the experiments going? do you have any results? and more
importantly,
have you tried the new dataplane export specifically for your peering use
case, which,
once configured and exported to the switch, is fully control plane free, that
is, if
you wish, you can even kill the java process completely and the switch will
operates
like before... in this case imho your security team cannot find a single
point... :)
thanks,
cs
On 8/21/22 17:27, Everson Borges wrote:
Hi Csaba,
I noticed something strange and I can't find the problem.
When I ping POZ0001 from AMS0001 through the loopback0 interface it doesn't
work, but when I ping AMS0001 from POZ0001 works.
Do you have any tips?
AMS0001#sh run int l0
interface loopback0
description AMD0001@lo0
vrf forwarding CORE
ipv4 address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
ipv6 address fd00:51e5::a:1:1:1 ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
template template1
router ospf4 1 unsuppress-prefix
router ospf6 1 unsuppress-prefix
no shutdown
exit
!
POZ0001#sh run int l0
interface loopback0
description POZ0001@lo0
vrf forwarding CORE
ipv4 address 10.4.4.4 255.255.255.255
ipv6 address fd00:51e5::a:4:4:4 ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
template template1
router ospf4 1 unsuppress-prefix
router ospf6 1 unsuppress-prefix
no shutdown
exit
!
POZ0001#ping 10.1.1.1 vrf CORE
pinging 10.1.1.1, src=null, vrf=CORE, cnt=5, len=64, df=false, tim=1000,
gap=0, ttl=255, tos=0, sgt=0, flow=0, fill=0, alrt=-1, sweep=false,
multi=false
!!!!!
result=100.0%, recv/sent/lost/err=5/5/0/0, took 115, min/avg/max/dev
rtt=22/22.6/23/0.2, ttl 255/255/255/0.0, tos 0/0.0/0/0.0
AMS0001#ping 10.4.4.4 vrf CORE
pinging 10.4.4.4, src=null, vrf=CORE, cnt=5, len=64, df=false, tim=1000,
gap=0, ttl=255, tos=0, sgt=0, flow=0, fill=0, alrt=-1, sweep=false,
multi=false
.....
result=0.0%, recv/sent/lost/err=0/5/5/0, took 5001, min/avg/max/dev
rtt=10000/0.0/0/0.0, ttl 256/0.0/0/0.0, tos 256/0.0/0/0.0
Best Regards
Everson
- [RARE-users] Fwd: Loopback interface, mc36, 08/21/2022
- Re: [RARE-users] Fwd: Loopback interface, Xavier Jeannin, 08/22/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.