RARE user and assistance email list

[mc36 <>]

hi,

On 2/10/22 14:09, Tim Chown wrote:
> > > What matters most is the performance, hence our interest in the tests by PSNC 
> > > and on the Data Mover Challenge.  We   ve seen high rates from Joseph   s 
> > > device at UvA, but inconclusive results from PSNC (they probably need to be 
> > > more tightly defined).  We think in a scenario where there   s generally a 
> > > limited number of concurrent flows, the small Wedge buffers (16 or 20MB?0 
> > > should be OK.
> > so in psnc they did the measures over lr over cwdm which, in terms of 
> > inter-packet times and drops are not a good choice...
> > i remember clearly that initially we had 1 crcing lane out of 4, and after 
> > the swaps, the levels fairly was under warning...
> So what does that mean in practice if we want to use a Wedge running 
> RARE/FreeRtr as an access device for 100G servers?   The results Jospeh saw 
> for his device for the Data Mover Challenge were decent.
>
> Tomek is preparing new tests for RARE.

so believe in joseph's results and let's wait for the new psnc runs,
because the old psnc results are khm.. questionable.... :)

regards,
cs