Rare project developers

[Frank Slyne <>]

No problem Moises with the AWS credits, if they can be linked back to RENaaS objectives.

Frank

On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 at 14:13, Moises R. N. Ribeiro <> wrote:

Csaba, (adding Gabriel and Frank)

Thanks for you kind attention to our questions/demands. Sorry for the delayed response (winter break here). Gabriel will take care of your demands for VMs @ our Openstack (actually he offered you to deliver you freeRtr installed already, just send him your public key).

It seems that we still have credits @ AWS (from RENaaS), so you can eventually use our current "freeRtr backbone" to perform your tests; or create your own worldwide testbed from scratch, if Frank is ok spending AWS credits on that.

Oh, still on RENaaS, next week we have meeting with the IT team from Cape Verde University. They want to use freeRtr's SD-WAN to interconnect different campuses and Gabriel&Edgard will guide them through. So, new demands on that initiative may pop up at your freeRtr mail box. :-)

Regards,
Moises
----- Mensagem original -----
De: "cs" <>
Para: "Moises Renato Nunes Ribeiro" <>, "Frédéric LOUI" <>, "freertr" <>, "rare-users" <>, "rare-dev" <>
Cc: "Cristina Klippel Dominicini" <>, "Magnos Martinello" <>, "Everson Borges" <>, "Rafael S. Guimarães" <>, "marcos schwarz" <>
Enviadas: Domingo, 30 de julho de 2023 2:44:51
Assunto: Re: Packet Parser PolKA and reliability

so in my flat polka is linerate once i reenable the compilation of this....

dont u have some spare vm in your "notworking labzzzzz" moises to experiment

while i spend my holidayzzz!?!?!?!?!

if you still dont have the results then remind me this septermber to do your homeworks once again...

ps; also dont forget to cc the lists otherwise you'll get similar "wut?" replies as usual....

ps2: i just prepare stacking openvswitch to p4lang/* to do a better country wide w1f1 / better aviation / etc / here...

br,

cs

On 7/27/23 23:11, mc36 wrote:
> tldr?
>
> thx,
>
> cs
>
> On 7/27/23 23:04, Moises R. N. Ribeiro wrote:
>> Csaba&Frederic (Cc. Cristina, Magnos, Everson, Rafael)
>>
>> Two quick question to break the boredom of your summer holidays :-)
>>
>> 1) for freeRtr, the parse graph below (Fig. 3 in the attached document), PolKa does stand on a parallel path to the MPLS stacking/nesting of labels, right? Yet below VLAN... And
>> SR-MPLS exploits that MPLS label stacking (which is bypassed by a single PolKA element); anything outdated/missing in this 2013 diagram? and
>> **
>>
>> 2) For planning future demos, M-PolKA would be an enabler for reliability, right?...and trying always to stick to standards,   IEEE 802.1CB https://1.ieee802.org/tsn/802-1cb/
>> <https://1.ieee802.org/tsn/802-1cb/> seems the technique of "Frame Replication and Elimination for Reliability", which Rafael already implemented in his PhD work (but with the
>> help of chains of VNFs and not natively in the router). However, it seems that this IEEE 802.1CB has expired in 2017, anyone with more experience into IEEE inner workings methods
>> toward time-sensitive networking (TSN)? Another path would be via 5G's Release 16. There it indicates packet duplication over disjoint paths for URLLC using N3 and N9 tunnels
>> (https://www.3gpp.org/technologies/urlcc-2022 <https://www.3gpp.org/technologies/urlcc-2022>). I guess it is something like this:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-dmm-user-plane-protocol-and-architectural-analysis-on-3gpp-5g-system-00
>>
>> Regards,
>> Moises
>> *
>> *
>>