Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

rare-dev - Re: [rare-dev] SNMP sub-interface counter logic in bf_forwarder

Subject: Rare project developers

List archive

Re: [rare-dev] SNMP sub-interface counter logic in bf_forwarder


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Alexander Gall <>
  • To: Frédéric LOUI <>
  • Cc: <>
  • Subject: Re: [rare-dev] SNMP sub-interface counter logic in bf_forwarder
  • Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:32:23 +0100

On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:25:50 +0100, Frédéric LOUI <>
said:

> You can also merge bf_ifcounter, bf_subifcounter and bf_snmp_client thread.
> bf_ifcounter, bf_subifcounter is used to report intf and subintf counters
> to freeRouter.
> bf_snmp_client exports the same counters to SNMP files.

> The new thread can can to freeRtr unconditionally

> SNMP export can be exported if « args.snmp » is enabled

> What is your opinion ?

That would certainly simplify things and also avoid that multiple
threads have to maintain their own active_ports table. I'll start
working on that.

--
Alex

> After bf_forwarder.py modularisation, you are actually already one step
> ahead :)

> Thanks for your optimisation proposal.

> If you are OK feel free to apply your code.

>> Le 24 févr. 2022 à 10:10, Alexander Gall <> a écrit :
>>
>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:54:00 +0100, Frédéric LOUI
>> <> said:
>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>> Feel free to apply your fix to bf_forwarder.py and the p4 code.
>>
>>> The place where subintf counters are processed in bf_forwarde.py should
>>> be _only_ here:
>>> https://bitbucket.software.geant.org/projects/RARE/repos/rare/browse/bfrt_python/rare/bf_subifcounter/__init__.py
>>
>> Maybe it should, but it obviously isn't :( To avoid duplication of
>> code, I think we'll have to modify the counter modules with an API to
>> share this code with the SNMP module in a thread-safe manner. Other
>> suggestions?
>>
>> --
>> Alex
>>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page