Rare project developers

[Simon Leinen <>]

Tim Chown writes:
> I think the format of the draft doc is good.

thanks for reviewing!

> Simon, how do we publish this, with more info about the platform, and
> encourage / allow others to contribute ideas?

My idea was to publish the "projects" part to the Hackathon Wiki.  In
fact I did this just now, because we definitely have enough material,
and we can always change things later if necessary.

The remainder of the document can be used for our own planning.

I have added a list of (known) participants - please add yourselves!

And I have added some "next steps" that we should work on before the
hackathon.  Please have a look.

My main worry is that we find a way to make remote participants feel
included.  I suggest we try to use the Gather platform that the IETF
(including Hackathon) uses.  Maybe we could have our next meeting there
as an exercise?  https://app.gather.town/app/L4fNNdm1NJa1sE2v/ietf
(password: "notewell")

Another question is whether we should use the "Hacknet"
(https://hacknet.meeting.ietf.org/) for L2 VPN connectivity.  I guess it
could be useful.  So far only Mikrotik devices seem to be supported.
(Maybe a (meta-) Hackathon project would be to add support for this VPN
to RARE/freeRtr :-).

Cheers,
-- 
Simon.

> Tim

>> On 9 Feb 2022, at 15:55, mc36 <> wrote:
>> 
>> hi,
>> 
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HbbLPnrFp_gbN-cVuOVXnV5B3VkZuRUBwn1n7kcM7GY/edit#
>> 
>> not a bad idea but imho this part is ready already
>> 
>> http://sources.nop.hu/misc/netconf/
>> 
>> is then current source of netconf files,
>> but it's an automated tool to generate the yang files from the cli parser
>> the same way we serve the ? output,
>> the tab autocompletion
>> and the junos set <somecommand>
>> and maybe others...
>> 
>> the results are obviously not the ietf yang models but as i see, basically 
>> nobody follows those... :)
>> https://github.com/YangModels/yang/tree/master/vendor
>> 
>> regards,
>> cs
>>