Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

rare-dev - [rare-dev] PBR flow label access-list

Subject: Rare project developers

List archive

[rare-dev] PBR flow label access-list


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Carmen Misa Moreira <>
  • To: <>
  • Subject: [rare-dev] PBR flow label access-list
  • Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:07:29 +0100
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 188.184.36.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.geant.org smtp.mailfrom=cern.ch; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=cern.ch; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=1OoKH0i/2kRzNk7Bqvb9fN3O2FQF+LVy7pfb9vjLUrk=; b=NkkDLYHFgzWrrum6AUNfoJZYf3qvIr5JJnyVrRSz3NldfyJshvTC1gU6JoY52SPl4zHtWEC6tQ9bjctMr/qCNfIwsjN3JGzwJRQA3J2Wao/lLr7fWkzt2su42XyPeP5JR0zTUDetPjwFjJvT5AfWWLwelDwc1Jn3jc1EOC4U4hdAjI7XG2WVbszywmnvGyXfEvlYcnSlFBW/uhFf8fgoZUZMm/rWWzS2fOdlhCcmsKkZqMYYA7VG7eGbdma+4HxVzG5l6WUzd7pzLsZl4T3y0hZGOBpIlVramIygthWkxNpGSflLeNTRhxFSOpTdnBoh72i0/rvLTLQqCP9KnTj+vA==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YAqQU7LasDvUG7riYhVCuG7Fl3Ro8wvtbIC3usDrnOv5+C1nxCYy6eebl+v3/yTklCG9ovvk1VQNDFsB0WMwnYSreOUTNy5Ra7pSmAyr8CZIEcA+SD0LqhQPpkKTUD147ewEU/P28YwmHBQYQZaBVCABCU+cg3zFrAbgVObOicmNFsCpVVpxqzncFPKiSU516qULl91XoP00dUgf2XrbnE4SSVHM5dFdEBU3si5Xfdy8HifyQ0p+uF07HgZETZcdn59N08mxz7LLSygjf/h+jOxviH0tVsDeIGqa/1TLAy8b3deTPkGe0csxzopwAzUoaLvoNqbitrtlFbLSy4bjeA==

Hi all,

I see something weird in my access-list declarations...

If I declare the access-list like this (just with a single value) it works:

access-list ipv6_flowlabel_10
 sequence 10 permit all any all any all flow 10
 exit

But if I declare it with a range of values, it doesn't work:

access-list ipv6_flowlabel_10
 sequence 10 permit all any all any all flow 10-20
 exit

There is one example on the FreeRtr self-test but is using access-group-in: http://sources.nop.hu/cfg/crypt-acl72.tst

I was wondering if there is a limitation to match just a single flow label value in the access-list.

Best regards,

Carmen Misa




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page